Cheaters Are going to be TrackedDown!

https://i0.wp.com/www.bimmelbommel-clan.de/bub/include/images/cheater.jpg

Thats one of the first major decision taken after the leakage scandal. It has been announced that Cambridge will trackdown the cheaters and they are going to be penalised. I dont think tracking down the cheater can be pratically feasible! And i am 100% sure that all the cheaters cannot be retraced. In fact, there are some questions that travelled via emails, phone calls, sms. How will they track these??

About the Facebook group of Blackpapers.info, The profiles and pictures of those who participated int he discussion are they, but does this mean they are cheaters!?? does this mean these people didnt revise??? How can u differentiate between a genius and someone who cheated?

HOW ARE THEY GOING TO PROCEED???

No details have been reveaed about that. Sure that its going to be very diffucult. and innocents might get problems!

It is possible to retrace ppl using their IP address. Yes. but this involves a great deal of Privacy infridgement. MyT users have dynamic IP. It changes everytime you reset ur livebox. Without the help of the ISP(internet provider) its pratically impossible to traceback. supposed they managed to trace back the names of those internet connection owners who got access to those facebook groups or blackpapers forums, so what??? The names of their MOM OR DAD are thier, bot the name of the students! how are they going to knw who has a son/daughter sitting for exam!? Im still wondering!!

If Facebook collaborates will cambridge and hands over all details about the discssions that took place in those mini forums. Cambridge will get a very bad reputattion and ppl will feel UNSAFE in facebook. This will cause a major impact on Facebook’s popularity. not only in mauritius, but worldwide!

On the other hand, If Facebook doesnt collaborate, they dont loose anything, because i believe that they were NOT PROMOTING leakage. FB is just a platform for communication. just like any other.

FACEBOOK IS NOT THE ONLY PLACE WHERE THE PAPERS WERE LEAKED. (phone calls, emails, sms are also concerned.)

How are they going to track those cheaters????? IS our privacy at risk??? THERE’s absolutely no reason y facebook should be banned.

THE OTHER ugly PICTURE

The decision of tracking down cheaters. Whom does it benefit most??? Cambridge! of course. Whats the other alternative?? Make all the students resit and PAY FOR THEM!!! there’s no way all these students are going to pay again!! So who makes the loss?? yeah.. you got it… so whats the “profitable” solution?? track down cheaters! how???? NO IDEA!!

Waiting for more transparency about this topic. Share your view.s

NOTE : THE GOVERNMENT IS AGAINST THIS DECISION OF CAMBRIDGE!

UPDATE(01.35am 15/11/08) :

Article Written by Star03

***********************

I now think that these people are not cheaters as some of them did not know that the papers would be the same, they are being called so, because the real culprits need a scapegoat.
I think a resit is the solution, but the actual issue, is that can we attend the exams again? like me, i’m sure all other students are mentally exhausted… and we have forgotten most of what we revised! we need to relax, especially after two years of hardwork and sacrifices… HSC is once, why should we go through that all over again???
Even if the resit is in February or March, we will have study during the holidays, and some are planning to work to save money for their University courses, others are going abroad, others need to badly relax ,because of exams stress, i know many who’ve been sick…
Those who got the papers before will be tracked down, it means that those who did not, will be having their papers corrected like as if nothing happened, the threshold mark will not increase, or it won’t be done severely…
And going for a free resittin is extremely costly, CIE will not be able to pay for 10000 students…
its my opinion, now i don’t really know what will happen??
but i would like to know something, those who used the net, did not know they would be getting the same questions, what about those who use the phone or fax machine to communicate with their penpals or relatives who are abroad??? these students ARE actually cheating, they know that the papers will be the same!! these have been happening for years, i don’t understand why should FB or the students (called cheaters) be blamed for??
concerning those who reported, why did they do that after the xams only?? i read from one of the students who reported, saying that he got access to the information on the eve of the exams and he informed his friends, so they were in contact with papers too, they already knew what would come up too…
If they were really honest, they should have done so before the exams, a call would have been highly enough to start an inquiry, then if the facts were right the exams would have been stopped!
Now all the ‘big papers’ are over, we are somehow relaxed, because we can now enjoy the holidays, but its not the case….
And in 1981, the fact was that the real paper was leaked, it was not DISCUSSIONS! the real paper was actually out before the exams! that is why, cie had to conduct the exams again, but today, its the discussion going one between foreign students, who had previously sat for the papers, and by chance students from mauritius participated in their conversations, but is it really their fault??? i was totally against the cheaters, but now i know that most of them did not know it would be the same papers!!
i’m sure, we all thought that after the Singapore issue, every country would be having different papers, but now i came to know that its not the case….
try to think about that… i want justice too… but resittin just freaks me out… i’m not prepared yet and i’m far too tired… I KNOW I’M NOT THE ONLY ONE GOING THROUGH THIS…

*********************

The Decision has been taken. This article is being closed for comments. Pleaese proceed to the following article :

HSC 2008 Leak Aftermathh : No Reseat, the experts’ decision

Advertisements

228 thoughts on “Cheaters Are going to be TrackedDown!

  1. Cambridge is never gonna be able to track everbody who cheated! ther are too many means of communicating the information! If however Cambridge can track evryone who cheated, then it’s fine.

    The solution would be to both track the cheaters and punish them and make all students sit for the exams again (of course Cambridge pays). You should add this option to your poll above, I choose both the first and third option that’s why I didn’t vote…

  2. exact kaleem.. oft mo ti fek ecrir sa dan 1 post la.. mai lot thread la in closed.. lol

    pa pou kapav retrass TOU zelev kin GENUINELY cheat…
    kapav ena zelev in rent lor page la mai pan lire.
    kapav ena zelev zot IP pa pou paret, mai kmem zot in gagn ban “tiyo” la…

    epui, si li retass zot osi, ki pou fer r zot? “pini zot”..
    ki pou fer? zour zot? dir zot “c pas bien de tricher”?!??! ki “pinition” encor…? lol
    nimport kwa.. IMO, c just pou fer dimoun rest trankil sa zistoir “pou retrass ban cheaters et pren action cont zot”

    soi fer comme si pan ariv narnier (et donc perdi valer certifica cambridge)
    soi fer tou dimoun re-compoz ban papier leak…

  3. And tracking those guys will also means..Breach of their privacy..Something which is a heavily punished criminal offense.

  4. Making everyone to re take the papers will result in massive stress for the students.It will also result in mental disturbance.

  5. I dnt fink it will b possible 2 track all those “cheaters”..
    sm do not even deserve zis punishment.

    n how can we ignore z fact zat there r other means of communication??? It is nt only by facebook zat zis sharing of information has occured. N i fink cambridge as well shud be aware of zis!!

    wat shud b done i fink is 2 re sit 4 z papers. Ya zats gona b tough ofcourse. Students wil b stressed more zis time. But if we do not do so, our HSC certific8 wnt hold any value. :S

  6. instead of playing ping pong, why don’t Cambridge accept its fault?
    They should had taken the time difference into account and also we live in 2008 where technology is our second name.

  7. i seriously dont understand why do u call people who search the internet for exams papers, cheaters? did they know they were going to get the same paper? NO. its normal for everyone to do their max during exams periods..internet is just another solution to books and all.

    so basically all they did was to get some paper on the net and due to cambridge’s foolishness, it turned out to be the exam paper.

    resit? the guys who spent all that time revising who are the losers. the others are just lucky.

  8. I really dont see wat can Cambridge do in this situation. Accept their fault means what?

    go for a resit? i doubt so. but it might still happen. poor ”intello’s” ! aret lire live, rente lor facebook 😛

    track the guys? LOL

    Send everyone a letter of apologogy, they are used to it.
    Next year we will have Cambridge again 🙂

  9. Eh tushal, I know its a stress to go through all this again but if you dont want a leaked result which does not hold any value, you should consider a re-sit, its like sacrificing a bit if you see what i mean!

  10. will the innocents be suffered of those bloody students who did this bad things?what willl be the most severe action that the ministry of education can do ?will the law fight for the truth?

  11. Yes but u know tushal….if we had 2 re-sit it won’t B in december ofcourse….its ggonna b in febuary………..

  12. wat bad things did the students do? O.o

    they had an exam like everyone here..cept they faster than us at discussing it on internet.. im pretty sure 90% of them doesnt even know if mauritius actually exists!

  13. i have one question for u guys.. if u had the chance to have a look at the papers before exams, would u do it?

  14. hi frds,
    well i am for doing z exams all over again.its not fair at all. we’ve been working for 2 years, so much of sacrifices n hard work. n this is how we are being rewarded….

    it’s very hard for me to do z examz, but its z only way to distinguish btw who r z “losers n winners….”

    lets do it again!!! gudluck

  15. well i’m gonna reply to CANDLE’s question. let me tell u one thing. b4 the S1 paper, my frd n i were going through the site blackpapers.info. it was 4 the first time. we didnt take it seriously as we 4t it was just a bad joke….
    it’s human curiosity….even u wud have lookd at z kestion, isnt it??
    if we start doing such things, its useless to take part in z exam.

  16. i believe all questions set in past papers are repeated except the numbers,names are changed.it may be that they did the question b4 n they got it b the chance.there r questions reappeared after 4 yrs or more.if cambridge wants hsc students to re-take part in the exams then we have no other decisions than abide to it.

  17. candle!!!! its just that every1 cant get to c the papers!! if we cud c them, we would fal in the category of cheaters!!! the situation would b the same, but we would b guilty cheaters in front of our peers who ddnt cheat huh!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  18. I suggest resit. U wnt do HSC again. its once n for all. n it wil mark for life tht u guys fell in tht category. So, mite hv an effect whn u look for a job. thrs no other option. thrs a doubt already abt this paper. no one wil b able to trace this i guess. so save yr own skin n future n resit. Its nt tht bad. jst revisions again. thts it. i trust u all guys will do better than u did this time….GO FOR IT GUYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  19. Stop whining like little girls.
    And stop looking for excuses to have a better result.
    If you suck at a particular subject, it means you suck.stop making as if you worked badly just because they, by chance, got a copy of those questions.
    I’m starting to be fed up with immature people who knows nothing except to whine and whine about that.
    End of discussion.If you have worked badly in those paper.Just shut the fuck up and stop whining.
    sorry Sandeep for swearing.I’m just annoyed with so many people are keeps bitching about that topic.
    Some even said:
    “acoz banla nu pou gagne moV resulta”
    as if those guys made you work badly.

    Rant over.
    Get a life or get laid.

  20. We should resit…and punish those responsible for the leaking by canceling their paper and not allowing them to take part again….mo meme mo pas konten pou re-sit but results la pena credibiliter la…better have a well valid certificate.. btw resit la pou en january dapres MES koz mane anglais amuser en decembre zot…

  21. “it’s very hard for me to do z examz, but its z only way to distinguish btw who r z “losers n winners….”

    lets do it again!!! gudluck”

    Why are you caring so much about those who got a view of that paper?had you been able to get that paper, would you still say that?
    I bet my arse that you would be sitting quietly in a place and would had been quiet..

  22. “but results la pena credibiliter la…better have a well valid certificate.”

    Did those people sat for your paper?
    NO.It was you who did the paper.So why giving so much trouble for those idiots?
    Fack them and get on with your life.

  23. “if we cud c them, we would fal in the category of cheaters!!! the situation would b the same, but we would b guilty cheaters in front of our peers who ddnt cheat huh!!!!!!!!!!!!!”

    Grow up girl.Stop acting like immature people.Those people did not even know that they would do the same to same paper.
    And you can’t also classify them as cheaters.
    I bet my *** again that if you had known all this, you would had visited the website.
    Yeah I know how Mauritian mentality is.
    Enjoy your weekend.

  24. hey yash re sit is better.in 1981 there was leaked hsc and the students had to resit.it doesnt concern whether we have worked well or not.its a matter of justice.id cambridge make a decision that all the hsc students need to resit then we need to abide by its decision.Rs10000 pa gagne cumsa.ya the cheaters should be punished severelyy and all students should resit.

  25. Quote from another blog:

    The main issue here is the doctrine followed by the mother f**king families, a*s f**ked teachers and a*s l**king students who believe that only the mighty SC/HSC papers from Cambridge are their salvation towards the beginning of their career. There are other options but most motherf**kers are blind.

    {I have censored the swearings}

  26. “ya the cheaters should be punished severelyy”

    What gives you the right to classify them as cheaters?
    They are not cheaters.Get hold of a dictionary and check the meaning of a cheater.
    Grow up people.

    I have no courage to retype my comments.Check my above comments.

  27. Is There any justice after all?? we hve strived hard for 2 years to earn gud results and then there are some who already discuss ze paper.. they may have done in some hours the work we had taken two years to built…at least there must be a justice!!! exams need to be done fair and square.. equal opportunity for all

  28. Damn Tushal! U say stop whining! Damn it, i’m competing dude! I need that result, i need a good one… I cant afford to have my grades worsened because of some kids who got the papers before the damn exams. If you get that certificate, anyone, anytime peut le mettre en question. Anyone can say you copied and got such a good result (if ever you get a good result)! And then you’ll find yourself refused a job or a place in university so that another guy who copied gets the place. That won’t be fair, will it? Give that a thought. Et btw soigne ton anglais, sa laisse a désiré (sans vouloir offenser, mais je suis forcé de te le dire because of the way you went screaming and swearing at everbody who wanted a re-sit). Those people know why there should be a re-sit, they analysed the problem from all angles and were not feeble to say that they won’t sacrifice and go throught the whole damn exams!!!

  29. here is what happens : Cambridge is foolish enough to distribute the papers with quite a big gap in time difference. u all know the history. BUT THEY WONT TAKE THE BLAME, instead put it on the students who are in turn called cheaters. U all did past exam papers, and by pure luck, a question similar to one in the prev’ papers comes out, does that make u a cheater? according to u sarina, yes. Doing past exam papers makes us cheaters. and mevinash, ofc we all curious, but what happened there is not a leakage or cheating. Internet is free, u post wat u want when u want (copyrights stuffs ofc) but they always bypassed. they just made use of that tool to share their papers after their exams. thats it. Calling people who check papers online,cheaters, is simple retarded.

  30. “Simply cracking down on use of new Web tools like Facebook is not a sensible solution to a problem [that] is only going to get bigger,” warned TUC general secretary Brendan Barber in a statement.”

  31. “you went screaming and swearing at everbody who wanted a re-sit”

    Yes.Because many are blaming those guys who got the papers to be the cause of the bad working in the papers.I’m still trying to think where the logic is.

    Sorry for swearing I think that you do agree with me.It’s nice of annoying when you start to hear people say..

    “acoz sa banla mo in mal travail.” as if there is a relation between those 2 different parts.

    offtopic: facebook is blocked.

  32. Ok, i get your point! It’s true that they might not have know that those were leaked things they were reading… And of course it’s not because of them we get bad results but it’s because they get high marks that the pass mark goes higher and average students who were at the borderline of an A get a B just because the mark for an A goes higher. You do know that there needs to be a percentage of students who get A, the reason for which pass marks fluctuates. That’s why I think we should have a re-sit. This time, there will be tighter security and therefore no leaks and the results we get will be meaningful and nobody will be able to raise a finger at the results we get.

    Btw am sorry for saying all those things in my previous comment, it’s rude 😦 Sorry

  33. i completely agree with kaleem.. threshold will be sky high zis year because of the leaking… the best solution is to resit.. things will stabilise then..

  34. “ya tushar ur wrong absolutely wrong!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”

    Primo, its Tushal and secondo why am I wrong?

    Kaleem gave me his views and we found a common agreeing platform.

    No need to be sorry.

    The blocking of facebook will create a major uproar.

  35. it gona b a ggod thing to cheaters!!! as wel as cambridge MES and al !!!!

    justice shud b done!!! i believ in justice !!!!

  36. facebook is 20% operational.
    requests cant be viewed
    search box isn’t working properly
    neither are the discussion boards
    well correct that
    only 1% operational.

  37. ur wrong TUSHAL !!! for example if there was no cheating … every1 would work according to wat they learned n did in examz !!!

    after correction if the best got 70% in chemistry , then u got 60% ur chance of getting a B is big!!!

    But now that ther has been cheating many wil get good results, supose over 95% , wat wil hapen to the ones who did not get hints????? but r still good !!!

    think wel !!!!

  38. facebook is just a medium , i indeed agree with those who think this way!!!

    instead i would sing praise of facebook !!!! else zis cud go unnoticed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  39. Well guys….am very satisfied 2 see student reacting pluto positively!!! Though it is stressful 2 go through the exams again……it is the most decent way to do justice….I will repeat again wat the so called “cheaters” r “not” really those 2 be blamed…..Il n’y a pas 2 doute.C cambridge qui doit assumer son role……..Zot pas kone set 1 bon timetable……zot pas kapav fer 1 papier ki different pu different pays………..Et bien C aC clair…qui sont les vrai fautif

  40. To tushal:
    I agree dat classifying those students as cheaters is not right coz apparently it wasnt intentional in some cases. As for punishment I believe punishing them will not b the right thing to do…they r just students n disqualifying them will b ruining their lives. yesterday i was really panicked wen i heard abt the leakage… re sitting for the xams looks impossible for me yet i fink its the right thing to do coz i dnt want to end up wid a certificate for which i spent 2 years studying “d’arrache pied” which will hold no value coz if there is no resit,2008 certificates will b blacklisted.

    “students who believe that only the mighty SC/HSC papers from Cambridge are their salvation towards the beginning of their career. There are other options but most motherf**kers are blind.”

    well, let me tell you one thing,there may be other options(sat exams,etc..) but all these need financing. Taking rs10000 from the pockets of ur parents mite b easy 4 u so u get grip a grip on all ur “other options” but dats not the case 4 everyone. For further studies, for many, HSC certificate is the only thing they need to apply for universities. i dnt fink many ppl hav ur so-called “other options” to b accepted in universities.

    [“but results la pena credibiliter la…better have a well valid certificate.”
    Did those people sat for your paper?
    NO.It was you who did the paper.So why giving so much trouble for those idiots?]

    in reply to this comment, i believe it was clear dat its not abt who sat 4 da paper. Its just dat 2008 batch will remain blacklisted without a “leakage-free” resit. Universities who offer scholarship will not do so for our batch bcoz they wnt b able to distinguish between a genuine honestly acquired certificate n a shit one. N yea, i am competing n need a scholarship. i dnt want to lose 2 years of hardwork for nothing in return…a useless certificate.

    u tell ppl to stop being immature but i believe u r the one bein immature n ur even behaving as if u were among the ones who had acces to papers b4 exams..

    As for ur knowledge abt the mauritian mentality, believe me or not, i wud nt hav been trying to check out those papers even if i knew where to get them. N i knw many ppl who wudnt hav done dat either. N anyway, “qui s’excuse, s’accuse” maybe dat wud hav been ur reaction but pa fer sa vine ene generaliT. ena dimun ena lamour prop.

    however, i agree wid u abt ppl whining a lot working badly just bcoz some cheated..it’s true dat 4 papers which were suppozed to b very tough, we were expecting (atleast those who were honest) dat the min mark 4 a one in those papers will b lower but if some had access to those papers , thn their getting 90% out of those suposingly tough papers is inevitable…so passmark certainly pa pu baiC esp if there r many of them. Wid this leakage, our chances for an A is lowered but it’s true dat no one can come n say dat they worked badly bcoz some had acces to those papers….these ppl r just looking 4 scapegoats for their failure. Learn to take ur own responsibilities. Stop taking advantage of the situation…funny ppl

    im terribly tired after dis exams n the only thing dat kept me motivated 2 study this week was “encor kelke papier et c fini…”. Not ready for a resit coz i fear not performing well after so much stress. Yet im for a resit. i need my 5 A..a credible one.

  41. i believ we got a guilty here!!!!

    yes tushal got the papers b4 !!! hes fighting too much 4 these cheaters!!!

  42. “ur wrong TUSHAL !!! for example if there was no cheating … every1 would work according to wat they learned n did in examz !!!”

    It was not cheating.You are making as if you did not look for past papers.
    Most of those guys did not know that they would sit for the same paper.

  43. Cambridge should had ensure that all the countries sat for the same paper at the same time or make different papers for the different countries.

  44. “i believ we got a guilty here!!!!

    yes tushal got the papers b4 !!! hes fighting too much 4 these cheaters!!!””

    Do you even know to whom you’re talking?

    You do know that I can sue you for referring me as a cheater and for disclosing fake information about me.

    I sat for Hsc in the year 2004.

    I have better things to do than to blindly fight for those people.I was just making my point of view known to you people.

  45. ok think : som1 got those papers on that site, so many ddnt see it, must b few noticed it n the news spread!!! those who came to know n immediately got there to check out these papers r cheaters only!!!! but at the same time, this behaviour is human !!! but security lies in the hand of Cambrigde MES , time table isnt good at all !!!

    being 1 of HSC students , I can tel u all zat though my papers r not with me, i can list all ze questions in maths papers for example!!! i remember al of them !!! after the examz our exam papers r taken from us, we cnt take them home cuz students in other countries will b sitting in the same examz!! but like me , many others do remember everythn in the papers n if they hav family in those countries sitting for the examz the next day, they can send the questions via mail n along the answers also !!!

  46. but believ me tushal !!! there r so many pple here whose life can b ruined cuz of these!!! think about them

  47. Eh sarina, i know you’re on my side mais don’t accuse tushal! You don’t have serious proof against him… And try to understand him, he’s freaked out at the idea of doing this exams all over again :s

  48. I don’t use the hsc certificate.xD

    I did thought about everyone.
    The only “person” I can blame is Cambridge.

  49. And even if our thoughts are different, it won’t be right to say he’s a cheater… That’s a far too big “accusation”! Chill sarina, don’t get stressed

  50. ya m rely sory for that rely , but i know wat it means to hav a B instead of A… i got B in maths n wana do maths later, so i repeated HSC to get A , but if papers r leaked , my chance of getting B is lower 😦 😦

  51. You sat for HSC in 2004 tushal? How comes? U were saying above that you did not want to go through the exams again! I’m confused now..
    !?!?!?!?!

  52. I never said that I don’t want to go through the exams. I was talking in a general way.

    Yes.I sat for exams in 2004.

  53. copy paste my above comment..

    Your true career is made while you’re going to a university.
    {not referring to UOM}

    There is a big not referring to UOM..

  54. wel watever hapens is always 4 ze best, apre sak la montan ena la desante, donc lets wait , wi wi mo bizin aret streC e sorti lor sa angry mode la lol… sorry again 🙂

  55. Chill…I know the weather is hot but chill..Get some cold sprite or juice.You will feel better.xD

    Take good care people..and try not to be so angry.

    Sleep mode on.I hate weekends.

  56. Same here! I think I should go to bed, this leak thing is getting me down. Nice discussing with u guys, I kind of released part of the stress.
    Btw tushal, next time precise bien, i thought you were en HSC and you were not giving a real thought and not wanting a re-sit.

    I truly find re-sitting for this exams is the only way of doing justice so that the validity of our results is not “pointée du doigt”.

  57. Ala zot fatigue latet la…fr kuma moi ene ti post parla parla mo balyer balyer…mo gagne mo lavi…tou le zur 1 ti kfc…1 ti vodka…ki UOM zot p kozer…sa bne movement stress sa…..conzer p vini zot p coze recompozer…eh mo p al lapech dan conzer moi…pna tym pou rcompozer…..Bole To No tension…Cambridge ene gro sucker sa,zot croire li pou rod reprint tou sa bn ppz la at their own cost?? no wayz my friend….they wil definitely find sme wayz out in their own interest…Finet 1 lot rrrrrrrrrrr enkre sa…plito mo mo pa dir mm…lol..Nu pu ggne letemp vine bolom,cambridge pou trak cheaters mm…1 sel solution mo ban camarade…Vin lapech r moi dan conzer…sa resulta la pa pou amene zot loin apart fr zot ggne stress sa….Avoye exam merd!!!!

  58. @Kaleem: c’est bien de donner ton avis et d’inviter Tushal à renforcer son Anglais mais tu devrais le faire en Anglais aussi parceque ton Français est très mauvais ainsi que ta maîtrise de la grammaire.

    @All:
    concerning the “breach in privacy” issue. Let me quote the Facebook Terms of Use:

    “You acknowledge and agree that any questions, comments, suggestions, ideas, feedback or other information about the Site or the Service (“Submissions”), provided by you to Company are non-confidential and shall become the sole property of Company. Company shall own exclusive rights, including all intellectual property rights, and shall be entitled to the unrestricted use and dissemination of these Submissions for any purpose, commercial or otherwise, without acknowledgment or compensation to you.

    “To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, NO ARBITRATION OR CLAIM UNDER THESE TERMS OF USE SHALL BE JOINED TO ANY OTHER ARBITRATION OR CLAIM, INCLUDING ANY ARBITRATION OR CLAIM INVOLVING ANY OTHER CURRENT OR FORMER USER OF THE SERVICE, AND NO CLASS ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS SHALL BE PERMITTED. In no event shall any claim, action or proceeding by you related in any way to the Site and/or the Service (including your visit to or use of the Site and/or the Service) be instituted more than three (3) years after the cause of action arose.”

    “Limitation on Liability

    IN NO EVENT WILL COMPANY OR ITS DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS BE LIABLE TO YOU OR ANY THIRD PERSON FOR ANY INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, EXEMPLARY, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES, INCLUDING FOR ANY LOST PROFITS OR LOST DATA ARISING FROM YOUR USE OF THE SITE OR THE SERVICE, ANY PLATFORM APPLICATIONS OR ANY OF THE SITE CONTENT OR OTHER MATERIALS ON, ACCESSED THROUGH OR DOWNLOADED FROM THE SITE, EVEN IF THE COMPANY IS AWARE OR HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING TO THE CONTRARY CONTAINED HEREIN, THE COMPANY’S LIABILITY TO YOU FOR ANY CAUSE WHATSOEVER, AND REGARDLESS OF THE FORM OF THE ACTION, WILL AT ALL TIMES BE LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT PAID, IF ANY, BY YOU TO COMPANY FOR THE SERVICE DURING THE TERM OF MEMBERSHIP, BUT IN NO CASE WILL THE COMPANY’S LIABILITY TO YOU EXCEED $1000. YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT IF NO FEES ARE PAID TO COMPANY FOR THE SERVICE, YOU SHALL BE LIMITED TO INJUNCTIVE RELIEF ONLY, UNLESS OTHERWISE PERMITTED BY LAW, AND SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO DAMAGES OF ANY KIND FROM COMPANY, REGARDLESS OF THE CAUSE OF ACTION.

    CERTAIN STATE LAWS DO NOT ALLOW LIMITATIONS ON IMPLIED WARRANTIES OR THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF CERTAIN DAMAGES. IF THESE LAWS APPLY TO YOU, SOME OR ALL OF THE ABOVE DISCLAIMERS, EXCLUSIONS OR LIMITATIONS MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU, AND YOU MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL RIGHTS.”

    Nothing can be done through facebook on this subject, just forget it. *FREE* Resitting would be the best alternative for everyone!

  59. I guess I should improve my French, especially the grammar, i know “sa laisse a désiré” lol :p thanks for the tip!

    And thanks also for the privacy thing (I read only the comment you left at the bottom, c’est encourageant de voir des gens qui pensent pareil)…

  60. Tracking the cheaters?? Cambridge is NOT Google 🙂 Punishing the cheaters?? Cambridge is NOT Law!!! What the hell??

  61. I now think that these people are not cheaters as some of them did not know that the papers would be the same, they are being called so, because the real culprits need a scapegoat.
    I think a resit is the solution, but the actual issue, is that can we attend the exams again? like me, i’m sure all other students are mentally exhausted… and we have forgotten most of what we revised! we need to relax, especially after two years of hardwork and sacrifices… HSC is once, why should we go through that all over again???
    Even if the resit is in February or March, we will have study during the holidays, and some are planning to work to save money for their University courses, others are going abroad, others need to badly relax ,because of exams stress, i know many who’ve been sick…
    Those who got the papers before will be tracked down, it means that those who did not, will be having their papers corrected like as if nothing happened, the threshold mark will not increase, or it won’t be done severely…
    And going for a free resittin is extremely costly, CIE will not be able to pay for 10000 students…
    its my opinion, now i don’t really know what will happen??
    but i would like to know something, those who used the net, did not know they would be getting the same questions, what about those who use the phone or fax machine to communicate with their penpals or relatives who are abroad??? these students ARE actually cheating, they know that the papers will be the same!! these have been happening for years, i don’t understand why should FB or the students (called cheaters) be blamed for??
    concerning those who reported, why did they do that after the xams only?? i read from one of the students who reported, saying that he got access to the information on the eve of the exams and he informed his friends, so they were in contact with papers too, they already knew what would come up too…
    If they were really honest, they should have done so before the exams, a call would have been highly enough to start an inquiry, then if the facts were right the exams would have been stopped!
    Now all the ‘big papers’ are over, we are somehow relaxed, because we can now enjoy the holidays, but its not the case….
    And in 1981, the fact was that the real paper was leaked, it was not DISCUSSIONS! the real paper was actually out before the exams! that is why, cie had to conduct the exams again, but today, its the discussion going one between foreign students, who had previously sat for the papers, and by chance students from mauritius participated in their conversations, but is it really their fault??? i was totally against the cheaters, but now i know that most of them did not know it would be the same papers!!
    i’m sure, we all thought that after the Singapore issue, every country would be having different papers, but now i came to know that its not the case….
    try to think about that… i want justice too… but resittin just freaks me out… i’m not prepared yet and i’m far too tired… I KNOW I’M NOT THE ONLY ONE GOING THROUGH THIS…

  62. damn it i cant sleep.. am very much worried about the decisions.. i’ll collapse if a resit is carried out… its already 2 am… and am stil awaken….

  63. i’ve not read all the posts yet… (i stopped at kaleem’s first post #37)

    but i noticed something…:
    tushal, to mank credibiliter…

    u said “Just shut the fuck up and stop whining” mai si get bien, c toi ki p pleigne pli bocou ici la…
    to p comment lor tou ban posts, et soon u should be responding to mine, huh?

  64. ok, now i’ve read all the posts….

    ben les meme idee qui reviennent…

    to actually make justice, we should ALL re-sit…
    mai franchmen, mo pa croir sa pou ariver…
    ki sanla pou re-prepar ban papier, imprime ban papier, paye ban invigilators, re-corige ban papier? ki sanla pou paye sa?

    what about the time table? who will set it, and what about pupils who already have plans for january? some mignt be abroad, others might be working already…

    ce sera pa evident de refer les examens en janvier-fevrier…
    but well, it’s the thing to do if MANY pupils have actually joined the FB group… oft, dapre ban estimation, comier zelev in gagn acces a ban “tiyo”??

    coz nou tou p coz sa, sa p pass dan journal, dan radio, etc.. mai jamai mo pan tan oken chifr a propo nombre zelev ki fin “tricher”… si ce n’est qu’une douzaine, ben la franchmen, il vo mieu laisser passer…

    but one thing, when cambridge says it will track down the “cheaters” and punish them… it’s pure lies…
    how will they track the “cheaters”? and what kind of punishment? pou riss zot zorey?

    et IMO they are not even cheaters.. maybe they didn’t know they would have the same questions at the exams, but even if they did i’m on their side… ct a cambridge de prendr les precautions necessaire…
    zot pa kapav laiss zot papier trainer epui vin blam 1 zelev kan papier la in ateri devan li par accident/chance…

    et je croi bien ke le pire rest a venir… next year, nou geter ki precaution special zot pou pren…

  65. As cambridge says there were discussions on some topics which could appear in the exams so there were not real leakage.

    If there were leakage then there would be surely scans of the papers on the internet.

    Why did the guys wait for the p2 & p5 of physics to end, to report the matter to the mes?
    According to me the guys who reported it, scucked in these papers

    They could have done so on the 15th oct itself after the paper 1 of maths.

  66. As cambridge says, there were discussions on some topics which could appear in the exams so there were no real leakage.

    If there were leakage then there would be surely scans of the papers on the internet.

    Why did the guys wait for the p2 & p5 of physics to end, to report the matter to the mes?
    According to me the guys who reported it, scucked in these papers

    They could have done so on the 15th oct itself after the paper 1 of maths.

  67. alo ban zen..pa fiter pu resit..si ena resit pu tou dimun,sa ban papier cambridge pu set la pu mari mari kanon…zot pu regreter zon resit lerla…2 +,refer n exams ,foder ki tou dimune pres mentalement…ek ki im sure most of u pa mem pres pu resit koz zn fini plein ek lexamens la…kuma ena grand dimune dia..
    ‘TO SAY IS ONE THING, TO DO IS ANOTHER’…
    IM AGAINST RESIT, BUT li obvious ki certain papier ban zelev ena pu refer….koz pa posib ki pena laureat dan nu lepok..li injuste pu ban intello la…
    mo truver meiller solution, c ki resit pu selman saki anvi compete pu laureat…parski im sure sabanla zot assez fort mentalement pu resit pu certain exams..
    mo koner zot tou p impatient pu tane repons gvt…hope tou dimune sort gagnant dapres saki lucien finette ine dia…mai mo penser,dan n decision..touletemps pu ena ban gagnant ek ban perdant !!!!
    tc… c u..
    salaam

  68. GiDEZEL u said “si ce n’est qu’une douzaine, ben la franchmen, il vo mieu laisser passer…”
    u mean if these 12 become laureates, il faut laisser passer?????
    r u mad???!!!
    this is not done!!! even im competing!!! n i know i wnt even be ranked among the best!! but still there are others who have wrked realy hard n are expecting to be laureates??? wot will happen to them????
    even if only one person is involved in the leakage.. we cant just 4gt it!!!! c notre avenir ki est en jeu!!!!
    everybody is now aware that there is leakage in the papers 2008!!! our results will be valueless now!!!
    if we remain seated like this, after 3-4 yrs, wen we’ll look 4 a job, we’ll be immediately REJECTED and those who cheated will be accepted!! is that fair!!????

    nou tou p nek koser ici!!! cambridge p kuyone nu pu fer nu blier tou sa in some days!!!
    its high time to take some action!!!!( pas manifesT ou crazzz partou as some suggested, koz not to 4gt we are educated, sa nu laisse sa pu bn kuyon illetrer)
    si fer bn tricheurs la resit, zot pu ggn ene 2eme chnce..
    pena oken guarantee ke dan bn papier eco, acc pa ti ena leakage!!!!
    si dan 1 2 papier ti ena sa
    im sure it was the same fo other papers!!!
    the minister’s saying that we wnt be penalised?? do yu thk so??
    i dont, its easy to say all these only to prevent students frm going on strike!!!
    its not easy to re sit for the exams too..the sole solution is to cancel ALL the papers!!
    then later on, they talk abt resiting or wtever..we dnt mind!!!!
    moi mem mo pane ggne repo ditou!!!
    Feb-march 2008-> monthly assessment
    May-June 2008-> GCE A level
    July-August-> Mock exams
    September-> monthly tests
    October-November-> A level

    un ans entier in passe par sa!!! (test, exams, etc)
    just imagine komien stressant c t…
    n at the end???!!! wt happend???!!!!
    some stupids just got involved in leakage, n we suffer????

    si nu reste kumsa em..next yr pu ena ene grand surprise pou nu!! n it mite then b too late!!
    mem is the “cheaters” are penalised, cambridge will never reduce the passing mark 4 us!!!!donne plis la bourse c pa la solution koz bn cheaters pu parmi!!! not to 4gt the cheaters r from star schools!! they r intelligent though they cheated!!!

    On doit faire des chose pour faire entendre notre voix

  69. lol who are you calling cheaters? people who went on the net to discuss papers? u r to blame if u dont use facebook or blackpapers. not the guys who want to go ahead and learn from ”past papers”. im sure u have books of past papers, then if one of the questions comes out the same, ur cheating right??

    i really hate the way people called a discussion topic on exams, cheating! because the guys who did this, did smthg similar to a public groupwork. u participate, u get to know more.. and then next day, SURPRISE, its the same question. U r stressed because ur competing.. u learnt hard etc etc.. like everyone else.. do think of smthg.. the guys who at the eve are discussing of ”past exams papaers” are the ones who did nthg all the year round or the guys who would work day and night? im pretty sure if they could be tracked, u would be surprised by the number of intello’s in that. someone who wouldnt care much would simply stick to his books and notes.

  70. well..u can say that im a fb addict!!! even i went on “black papers. info” a few times just to get a clear view of the past papers!!! not for future papers!!!!!!!!!!!!
    they can be claasified as “;cheaters” bkoz they knew that these questions would come out in the papers..in the forum, one guy asked “Does any body know leaks or tips for AS level Chemistry paper 2)..n the questions were discussed!!! how can u explain that????
    n only after sitting for the papers, he realised that he should report the leakage to the MES????
    This is crap!!!!

  71. candle..mo trV to bien “FOR” this leakage when most of the students are against !!!!
    hope u’re fine!!!
    XD

  72. For me this is not leakage. wat the studs do isnt illegal at all. is there smthg that restrict you from discussing exam papers online? what is leakage to u? people asking others exams questions??

    LEAKAGE would be someone scanning and posting the exam papers before he should have officially got it. not someone discussing his exam questions. Cambridge has a great scapegoat, he put all the blame on students and u guys are following blindly behind.

    u cant prevent someone from posting on a forum (unless it is prohibited stuffs and all..porn etc ).

    Cambridge is to blame for all that.. its them who had to make sure of the security stuffs.

    ====
    95 | Tishta

    November 15th, 2008 at 6:39 am

    well..u can say that im a fb addict!!! even i went on “black papers. info” a few times just to get a clear view of the past papers!!! not for future papers!!!!!!!!!!!!
    ====

    lol u said it all. the past exam papers. like thousands of overseas students did. u were on blackpapers! OMG UR A CHEATER THEN!! right?

  73. if i had to sit for the past exams papers, then u classify me as a “cheater”..thats ok..but i did nthg wrong koz i dint discuss NOV 2008 papers!!!!!!
    et sa 1 lepok ki mone passe par sa site sa… abt 3 months back!!!!
    yeah even i thk cambridge is to be blamed entirely..but blive me they wnt take any right step! we, students will be penalised…

    <<<>>>>

    i really thk that the CIE was aware of the forum..thats y they said that they will be able to track the students…
    this news is even more stressful that the exams itself!!!

  74. unless the students decide to voice out their opinion instead of giving MES and CIE ‘carte blanche’ to make the next moves.

    how many people didnt have access to blackpapers? thousands. but how many were able to discuss it on the phone, sms, msn without going on facebook or bp? hehe. perhaps the number of studs ‘caught’ will be far less than the real numbers of studs having discussed the papers.

  75. inutile nu discuT..im sure prmi nu mem ici bisin ena sa bn dimune ki impliker dan sa “leakage” la…
    cki MES et CIE decider saem nu pu obliG accpT..mais mo koner next yr pu ena pli boku zelev ki pu repeat compared to the number of those who will pass..n im sure i’ll be among the repeaters mem *snif*

  76. quoting Tishta:
    GiDEZEL u said “si ce n’est qu’une douzaine, ben la franchmen, il vo mieu laisser passer…”
    u mean if these 12 become laureates, il faut laisser passer?????
    r u mad???!!!

    no, i don’t think i am…
    mai franchmen, toi to penC ki si 1 zelev pan travail 1ans et ki li fin gagn locasion discute klke(pas tou) question ki ti pou sorti le lendemain dan certain(pas tou) de so ban papier, li ena 1 chance sorti laureat?
    en tou cas, moi si mo ti 1 dimoun ki genuinly in prepar moi pou compete, mo ti pou offenser par to lopinion…
    franchmen, pour les bourses, mo pas croir li pou affecter kitsoz…

    par contre, pou ban grades, si effectivmen BOCOU zelev in “tricher”, sure li pou affecter ban thresholds pou ban grades…

  77. Hey tishta, I completely agree wiz u……..ek sa zafer threshold mark la…….buku zelev pu alle bez repeat sa….Am just thinking about physics…..buku zelev pu fail ladan sa……Ey nu pu bizin agir 2 facon tres diplomatique….N anyway we cannot stay bras-croiser sans rien faire……N let cambrigde b ther real winner…….Wat abt those poor guys…???

  78. mo penC si zot ine kpv ggn bn hints pu fisix etc..zot ine bisin osi ggne hints pu lezot sujets. et pa nek zelev science ki pu penaliser aster… c bn zelev eco osi!! et d’ailleurs papier accounting TOUGH!!!!
    on top of that, treshold pa pu baisser..saem ki pli fer moi encolere la!!!! kot ti kpv o moins ggn 1 B..pu ale bez ggn D E aster..

    .GiDEZEL—->””””mai franchmen, toi to penC ki si 1 zelev pan travail 1ans et ki li fin gagn locasion discute klke(pas tou) question ki ti pou sorti le lendemain dan certain(pas tou) de so ban papier, li ena 1 chance sorti laureat?”””””

    c sa penC lamem ki tente zeleve tricher!!! si tu tricher dan 1 papier particulier..seryer lerla non???? kisanla ine dir toi zot pa ine travail 1 ans..mo fer toi koner bn intello sa!!! zot deja top dan tou sujets..et on top of that, zot ine ggn exact hints..et pu bn zeleve ki p compete sa 1 2 points ki zot ine ggner emplus la li compte boku sa!!! akoz 1 point ene zeleve kpv paC ou fail!!!!

    bn zeleve ki p compete ki pu pli souffert la..akoz sa perhaps sa pa p affekT toi..

  79. guys guys.. chill.. with the decisions taken most of you will be happy.. there’s 75% we are resitting, but seriously i am not for this resitting thing… its not those students fault.. but still we will have to pay for that… there’ll be no holidays for us… it seems that you should be happy?? maybe those who fucked up in their papers will hav another chance to retake the exams COMPLETELY FREE!! and they are sure that they didn’t study for two years, and now they won’t even be called third-years… now for those selfish students ,this is a golden opportunity… waiii, c super la solidarite estudiantine… pfffft…

  80. I read up to 98th comment.
    The decision of the marche a suivre will be taken on either Monday or Tuesday.
    Till then, just chill..

    **I know many people who are against the idea of re sitting for the exams**

  81. To GiDEZEL

    Are you always this stupid or are you making a special effort today?
    {Note that I’m asking a question}

    There are many students who want to re sit for the exams not because of the leakage but because they have badly worked for the exams.

  82. Why are you people making such a big fuss?

    The “leakage” of paper exists since a long time.

    It’s just that now the relevant authorities are making this a big headlines.

  83. To star03
    Quoting from what you said
    “maybe those who fucked up in their papers will hav another chance to retake the exams COMPLETELY FREE!! and they are sure that they didn’t study for two years, and now they won’t even be called third-years… now for those selfish students ,this is a golden opportunity… waiii, c super la solidarite estudiantine… pfffft…”

    You have said it perfectly.Many among those who are shouting for a re sit are those who have badly worked and wants to have a second chance.

    Before the idiots come out to flame me, let me make something very clear.

    I said MANY AMONG THOSE and no where did I intend to refer too all of the students who want to re sit.Some are genuine while others are just ” de tirer profit de cette occassion” to cover their own asses.

  84. Those who are facebook addicts including me.

    A good news for you people.

    Facebook will not be banned in Mauritius.This has already been confirmed by the relevant authorities.

  85. I still can’t figure out why so many people are flaming those people got the tip.My bet my life.Many among you would had checked that website to know for tips if you’re aware.

    c la mentaliT mauricien sa..Don’t deny.

  86. maths P1 was leaked! rite? dat was on 15th october

    who guarantees that p3 ,m1,s1/s2 pprz were nt leaked( they r international pprz as well!)

    y dint they report this at dat instance itself?y r they doin it now after we’ve already taken physics p2 n p5 n da remaining paprz r only Multiple Choice questions??

    I BLIVE THAT THEY HAVE ALSO PARTICIPATED IN DIS LEAKAGE..

    n WTF..cheaters r gna b tracked down..how dey gna do that..IP’s can always b changed…wot abt sms’s n phones calls..
    I blive dat we shud re-sit coz m afraid abt z thresholds

  87. one word- CIE= Cambridge inevitably errs!!!

    btw astr mo p rapel si sa scandal ti occur avant paper 1 G.P
    Mo ti capave fr essay lor modern high technology la XD..

  88. btw..i am not for the “cheaters”]
    But what about those who talked on the phone,chat on the web and who sent fax to know the questions?
    Is not the one who reported the matter also a cheater?? He reported it after taking the exams despite knowing the questions that will come out?

  89. kifr zt laureat minded kumsa ein ????/
    ki pu resit ????
    zot fou ou zot folle ???
    zt koner kantiter stressant pu resit ????
    enta p mari exciter touu..maybe zon fane mari dal dn zot bn papier..saem zot p otant fiter pu resit….
    ek weps…pa apel sa leakage paper sa..
    leakage paper in occur en 1981…kot ban etudiants moris ti fini ggn papier la net 2pi 1 ou 2 zur avant..lerla…li ti obligatwar pu zot tou resit sa lepok la…sa kin ariver fk la en nov 2008 la seki selman some ‘useful’ tips in divulger par ban etudiants pakistan et malaisie lor facebook…ek im sure bien tigit dimune ti kone sa….alor pa akoz la minoriT ki la majoriT BZN RESIT !!!
    OUT OF QUESTION..
    2 +,SA BAN ZELEV KIN TRUV SA LA PA ENTOR…..TOU HUMAIN TI PU FR SA SI ZOT TI PREN CONNAISANCE DE SA BN TIPS LA 2PI AVANT….
    L’UNIK RESPONSAB EST SOLELY MR_CAMBRIDGE KI DEKLAR LI BEL MARI..

    1…PARSKI BAN EXAMS PA SET MEM LER EK LEZOT PAYS…

    2..PARSKI ZOT SET PRESKER MEM PAPIER PU DIFERENT PAYS…AKOZ ZOT TELMENT TALE FESSE…

    EK WEPS..DAPRES SA KI MN LIR LOR ZURNAL…CAMBRIDGE P DIA LI PA OTANT GRAVE EK KI PARET PA PU ENA RESIT MEM…EK WEPS CAMBRIDGE P DIA LI PU TRACK BN DIMUNE LA…SA MARI FOS SA KOZ SAKANTITER MOYENS KOMUNIKATION ENA LA..BEIN PU SUPER HARD PU CAMBRIDGE TRACE TOU FOTIF…

    NYWAYZ…MO SIR NIMPORT KI DECISION GVT PREN NXT,,…ENA ENTA PU CONTENT 2 SA DECISION LA..ENA ENTA SI PU GAILER….

    TAKE CARE …. BYE !! ARET STRESSER..
    ‘WAT HAS BEEN DONE CANNOT BE UNDONE’..~~~WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE….

    LE MAL EST DEJA FAIT… !!!!

  90. resitting wud stil remain the best solution to remov the blot on our certificate!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HSC 2008 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! huh

  91. lol..resit sounds easy sarina.. more time to prepare for the exams eh.. the studs who were going to screw up are given a new oppotunity.. the ones who studied hard like hell..wat happen to em?

  92. wel i did my best 4 the papers … i studied like hell too, but zats the reason y i want a resit!!! so zat my hard work doesnt get wasted!!!

  93. maths chemistry n physics r not subjects that 1 can learn at the last hours!!! big affort r needed!!! u can learn ur book by heart n may not b able to answer all questions!!!
    As its said PRACTICE MAKES PERFECT n the june papers r reD, so y not giv those to us immediately!!!
    ur talking about opportunity to those who did not learn!!! wat about the opportunity zat has been given to those who got the answers!! n our not fighting will only ensure this opportunity to them!!! n at whose cost??? not only mine!!! but those who worked like hell only!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  94. neva pu ggn june papers…
    cambridge pu set special papers….ek pu mari mari mari special…
    zt koner y ??
    koz li pu mari mari mari kanon…
    cambridge in plein r nu..si en resit,zt pu regreter !!!

  95. To all here !!!!

    think of the day u got the results!!!!

    ya u did realy ur utmost best 4 these papers!!! toiled day n nite!!! during the examz u found al questions easy!!! but u never know u’ve left som mistakes behind !!! but u then said : oh never mind al ze others r ok , ill catch up!!!

    to ur great surprise, ur friend next to u in class who wud always stay on facebook all day al nite never doing any homework, n all suddenly show u her A in physics!!!!

    n u got a B , mayB by a difference of only few marks cuz the range may turn out to b

    over 94 % A
    u got only 93.5 % how would u feel ??????

    After result when u wil go n fight for ur expected result… who wil help u??? u only ddnt fite for a resit so that all get equal chances!!!

    u wil then b asked to pay for Rs3000 per subject to recorrect or remark ur subjects!!!!!!

  96. all students cant b laureat , every1 has got his own potential , equal chances hav to b ensured to all students!!!

    think of that labourer’s sweat, hard work in the sun, got Rs10,000 4 ze fees n finaly his son hav to repeat HSC at his own cost cuz of som pple who cheat!!!!

  97. hey get this clear damn it.. no one cheated in there. A student,finish his exams,gets online..talks bout the exams papers.. others see it.. discuss bout the papers and stuffs.who the hell cheated? did someone steal the papers and posted them on the net? NO

    Cambridge even admitted not all questions were discussed and even said the papers were not fully available online.

    How can u call someone who uses internet a cheater? he woulda been if he hacked CIE or stuffs like that,but not participating in a forum, discussiing papers without knowing what will be happening the next day.

    Yes, definitely students will be penalised either way. But think of that guy who has loads of money,who was going screw up his exam, but given another chance.. and get to pass real well,betta than that labourer’s son who toiled day and night.

    its a fact that some will be penalised. even u might be penalised in doing a resit. What if u CIE gives u nother exam,changes the format of the paper and raise the standards and all that stuffs, decides to really shoot u guys down. then everyone will b happy.because? everyone will fail ‘equally’?

  98. Wat da fuck??! whether or not they raise the standards, atleast it will b fair! damn it!! N if its a tough paper, it will b so for everyone…n 4 ur kind info, threshold marks r decided according to the general performance. N candle, looks like u just dont understand the biggest problem… if there is no resit n only these exams r considered, universities may nt accept 2008 batch fearing these results r nt honest… its been on the net n newspapers dat there has been leakage in countries like MRU!! do u realise dat universities may give priorities to other countries rather than mauritians!!??!! N wat the hell do we care abt hw to call students who had access to papers b4 exams?? get real! the real problem here is our results!!

  99. not every1 is prepare to resit…..resit is shit….wat resit ????
    u fink its easy bloody guys ???its jus a motherfucker stuff to resit !!! n i fink most r against ‘resit’ !!!!

    and yes…i am going nxt mth abroad for university wiz my june results !!!
    so…do u fink i hav time for resit ????
    time is priceless and resit will require months of setup !!!

  100. these students are NOT cheaters! they came to discuss on a forum. they did nothing wrong legally. CIE would have no legal rights to attack them.Lets me see how they do this! how come we pay big money to cie and this profit making organisation can’t even ensure the security of their paper! now its true that scholarships can’t be awarded on a “leaked” examination.but the government cannot withdraw scholarships without prior notice (again not legal). the best solution i feel is that students should be given the choice to resit or not! however if they are running for the scholarship they should be compelled to resit. those who are not competing may choose to resit or not. anyway we, students should voice out our thoughts and suggestions QUICKLY before the end of the examinations. i suggest all headboys and headgirls from all colleges should meet and make sensible suggestions to the mes. WE SHOULD SIT UNDER PROTEST FOR THE REMAINING PAPERS!

  101. quite a good idea to have a meeting between the head’s.

    resit still leaves me really confused to how it will make the situation better. i find those who really want to resit kinda selfish(i dont blame em but…) tbh. for a couple of reasons i really oppose that resit its just a chance to to many to do betta koz they didnt work well in the papers.. a new opportunity to seize. resit also would be a disaster to many many people. who the hell does hsc 2 times in 1-2 months interval? the mind set changes completely after a paper. many people just do the hsc for the sake of it. some target the laureats..some are born laureats (fking no lives ftl). they might be the real losers. someone who toiled day and night..someone who might be a labourer’s son for example.

  102. i dont wan’t to resit though i am competing i know that i have lost several marks in all the paper i have sat for.
    If there is resit then last year batch should also resit!!!!!!!!

    i think like that because who knows if there was leakage at that time
    —–
    Other want to re-sit because they consider it as a second chance to perform better..

  103. resit??? et sa osi nek pu fisix, chimie et maths p1 & p2!!!! dir cambridge garde so papier, garde so resultat pu li mem!!! mo nepli bisin sa moi!!!
    ggn laraz kan pense sa aster!! ban zelev osi enta zest r zot..ena penvi resit, ena penvi ena laureat..KI ZOT ENVI ALORS???? bisin 1 2 ale jete lecorps?????

    fer cki envi..mais resit 4 some papers only is not a good solution also..koz bn lezot zot results will be meaningless!!!! a moins si fer resit pu tou papier..mais sa pu pren boku letemps!!! et moi la fin janvier mo p kot moris..p ale etudier en Australie r mo resultat june(hopefully mo ena sa o moins)…
    tou sa nu p exprime nu lor fb r lor blog!!! zot koir li fer leffet sa!!! finette pu vin lire sa ou mr cambridge?????
    grow up guys n gurls!!! apre jour ggn result zot pu xtra regreter sinon (including me)!!!

  104. yeah..et si resit resulta will be out in june..et enta zelev pa pu moris..
    ena enta ine fini komence wrk lor contra, zot pa pu kpv resit
    Li pa possible fr resit akoz fr n 2eme exam, li equivalent a double stress, double traka, double revision ek zelev pu perdi 1 semester deja for uni.. c 1 perte de temps ek resources sa!!!!!
    si pu ena resit, MES pu bisin re paye invigilators, etc..li pa facile…

    si ena resit bisin ena pu tou papier pa nek sa 3 la!!!!!!

    costs>benefits

  105. Too many organizational mistakes from cambridge. Instead of accepting they made a blunder in the timing schedule of the papers and also gave same exam papers in different countries at different days, cambridge is going after the so called cheaters!! Very laughable.

    MES cannot cancel the exams papers and redo it. It’s not fair to students. The Ministry should simply double the number of national A level scholarships allocation this year. That’s the solution.

  106. “resitting wud stil remain the best solution to remov the blot on our certificate!”

    Re sitting is the worst solution.
    Do you form part of the group of students who have badly worked and just need an excuse to re do the paper without having the brand name “3rd year” ?

    @Yupri–>Some idiots.You know, the world of idiots strike again.xD.

    @Candle and gwen–>You’re right but they will still brand the people as cheaters.Guess some people are plainly stupid.

    Something important—>stop being the Yes sir of Cambridge.It’s the fault of Cambrige so stop fucking blame those students.Can’t you people notice that Cambridge is taking mauritian students to be stupid?
    I just heard something on the radio.

    “Cambridge knows how to know who cheated in the papers”
    Oh my fucking god, does Cambridge own a “boule de crystal” ?
    If yes, Cambridge, please tell me, will I be the most successful and richest person in the world?

    **We all know that it’s so easy to fool many Mauritians**

    Since when are the youngsters of Mauritius so stupid?
    HOW ON THE FUCKING EARTH WILL YOU PEOPLE TRACK DOWN THOSE PEOPLE? ?
    It is virtually impossible to track down even half of those people.
    and what crime they did?
    THEY BREACHED NO LAWS.

    You can’t sue a person who did not breach any law.
    Stop being stupid and stop acting like idiots.

    There is no law which prevents you from discussing your exam papers.

    Grow up and stop whining.

    Have a bloody fucking Sunday.{I hate Sundays, Wish I could remove that day from the calender}

  107. Many students are unhappy because primo, they did not get to see the paper and secondo they worked badly in the exams and they just need an excuse to re do the exams without having the 3rd tag on their fucking arse.

    Many people are saying, sue those guys.

    Yes you fucking retards.
    Sue those guys.But under what ground?
    grow up immature people.Bleh.Immature people can’t grow up.

    They did not breach any law.
    In no law did it state that one is not allowed to discuss the exam paper.

    Don’t you people do it?or did not you people did it once before?

    how many among us discuss the paper as soon as exams are over?

    I bet everyone among us do.Even I did and I still do it.

    After each exams, I really discuss the paper with friends to have an idea of where perhaps I did some silly mistakes.

    Are we cheaters?No.
    Did we breach any law?No.

    Then shut the fuck up and get on with life.

  108. u ppl here ur just idiots who really wanna lose 2 years of hardwork. im for resit n believe me im nt in a very good state! vivre avec l’hantise d’echec…mo kne sa tro bien. i was so stressed b4 my physics paper, i fell unconscious on the eve. Yet i was really satisfied wid my physics paper on the next day. im ready to go through the same stress just bcoz all dis stress n hardwork will be wasted if there is no resit. i dnt wanna hav a certificate which will b considered as useless or which may be questioned upon its validity. i knw i must hav done silly mistakes but im really damn happy wid my performance coz i felt close to getting an A. Imagine wat i went through wen i heard abt the leakage. Possibility ki threshold mark pa baiC for papers which were supposed to b tough is higher…meaning possibiliT of getting an A is lower. if students like me want to resit are called selfish, thn yes i am. n i dnt care abt wat silly ppl think abt me. 2 years of hardwork needs reward. even i was supposed to b working at State bank after exams, so wat? HSC results r mre important coz i hav to apply for universities. N u ppl r talkin abt losing a semester in universities, unless u r applying 4 UOM, other universities will give priorities to students from other countries rather than mauritians. this leakage is all over the net n newspapers!! on top of that it involves facebook. Such a well reputed site…c 1 mari scandal!! Hw abt students who were supposed to b goin abroad?? those who hav june results, good 4 u. N hw abt those who dnt hav em?
    N yea, stop blaming those guys kin denonce leakage MES only after physics high weightage papers ine fini!! they came to knw abt it only after! zot ban mari ingra. the ones who did that did that for friends who were expecting to b laureats n for everyone who hav been honest throughout the exams period!they did dat so there can b fairplay!! Now c the result, u ppl r just finding scapegoats to b able to blame them of this situation. N yea, this is wat is called selfish! trying to make things fair for everyone!
    c kan ena ban scandal kumsa ki nu kav fer sanzmen! system la pa bon! zot koz boku! just scroll n reread all the posts on this page n c how many of u said dat cambridge pa pu fou narnier. Paradox c ki zot kne li pa pu fer narnier bt yet zot p attan ki cambidge dne so decision!! zot kne ki nu ena capaciT boycott cambridge?? cambridge is to b balmed…n those who feel dat bzn boycott cambridge, let me knw. Kav fer sa mai zot bzn pre pu ggn menace 2 mor ek ban zelev ki penvi resit. Sa problem bien grav. ek zot zot p vine lor blog pu diskit expenses of cambridge. Dire ek pren action, c 2 choz different. Ban koz boku kumen zot, mne truv bku. mo kwar pa kiken ici ine ggne menace 2 mor zis parski lin dir o et for ki li penC lor sa issue la. Ban imBcil ki nek dir zot lopinion lor blog pa pu kav sanz kitsoz. Navin ramgoolam ek tou sa ban minis la ggne approx rs20000 kom argent 2 poche kan zot voyager(par jour ou par semaine), zt zot p ggne traka paye invigilators???pa blier nu futur main d’oeuvre moris ek c nu ki pou voT dan les ané a venir. si nu dcid pu fer kitsoz nu kav fer…mai si pna solidariT ek ki certain vine plaké devan zot pc zis pu plaigné lor blog. Mo pa kwar kav fer kitsoz. sirmen zt p dir , b mwa ki mo p fer lor sa blog la alor?? mwa mo zis la pu essay fer zt compren komier kitsoz en jeu concernan sa exams la. Vu ki ena enta HSC students here, i would like to let u knw ki ena ban etudiant ki p mobiliser et ki p fer kitsoz concret kont cambridge. one thing is sure as from dis week, cambridge pu ggn so bezer! we may b a small island( peutet mem ki zt consider nu kumen ban aborigene ki met zis fey banan) bt nu oci eduké ki ban dimun lezot pays n we knw hw to make ourselves heard. Im still for resit, make cambridge pay for it or else ask for IB. seki pa envi resit akoz tro boku stress, thn just too bad. Im ready to take dat in even if i get a B this tym but atleast ban universiT ki mo pu apply pa pu remet mo results en kestion n instead accept someone who got a C but who wasnt among the countries involved in this leakage. the guy kin denonce leakage to MES , HATS OFF TO HIM!

  109. Angelikdevil you not correcting the exams papers,right? wat the fuck u know bout standards and stuffS? just wat teachers told u,right? Teachers say ”CIE WILL FUX U ALL” and everyone is like CIE WILL FUX U ALL. cmon dont be silly. u dont even know wats coming..u just spreading rumours. thats it. there is a problem, get a solution ffs. not smthg like ” ptete bien uni pa pou pren nu compte.”

  110. i believe that the very news of exam questions being leaked is JUST ENOUGH. li juste inacceptable.

    ena familles p depense gro kass pou paye examens SC/HSC. zot p investir dan zot zenfant pou ki bne la kapav progresser. mais si au tout debut competition la li pa fair, mais a koi bon? zot l’argent pa vaut narien?!

    l’education c ene trampelin pou bokou etudiants. le fait mem ki ena fuite li scandaleux.

    pou obliger ena perdant la dans. mais nou bisin MINIMISE bane dommages le plus possible et c kan tou bane etudiants concerner reunis ek discute sa problem la ensemble ki nou pou kav trouv ene solution. NOU FUTURE EN JEU.

    ene premier pas c chaque college organise ene ti discussion entre bane zelev ek essaye trouve ene solution.

    nou tou dan mem petrin la…

  111. @ Angelikdevil
    What, the guy who reported the matter only knew about the leakage after the exams??
    I think you have the wrong info..

    One of the guys that talked on radio + , said that they went on facebook on the eve of the exams at about 1. am…and that they even chat

    and despite the fact that i a competing..
    I totally agree with what cambridge says there were no real leakages..
    Those who want a resit are only those who want a second chance to perform better.

    And let me tell you something ..suppose someone worked a past-paper on the eve and some of the questions came out then is that called leakage?
    Suppose your tuition teacher had made you practise some exercises on the eve and those questions came out in the exams..is that called leakage???

    and seriously i have to say that some questions that came out in section B p4 of Physics already came out in the years 2002-2006.

  112. Wa angellikedevil mo tout affet daccord r toi…..moi mo dir this is the year bizin fer sanzement…..We as students we have our rights…….N yes tonn bien dir apropo sa ban zelev ki p pretend pa egoiste…..N judging others as being egoiste……FauD pas laisse cambridge sott gagnant… zot p kokein nous dpi tous sa temps la…….
    paye gros kass…….en retour sa ban buffon la zot pa kav set 1 bon timetable…..zot pas kapav fer 1 papier unique pu Maurice…….Hey we should B feeling more “mature” now 2 tackle the exams again instead of being afraid……2 toute maniere mon dimand ban proff.zot in dir si ena pou fer re-sit it will b in Feb!!!!!

  113. X-factor, its true dat the questions dat came out 4 physics paper was repeated i worked out nov papers as from 02 to 06 including the specimen one b4 exams…n some questions were really repeated, from the diagram to the questions(for eg,question on brownian motion la ene fotocopy sa). But thn, everyone here got access to past papers so we were all on the same “pied destal” but here wid the leakage, some had access to the exact questions to wat was supposed to b in d paper. they even discussed the answers! but wateva!! the thing is our certificate will b useless nw dat everyfing concerning the leakage is out!

    As for stupid candle, even if CIE decides to give a really tough paper, its neva goin to b out of the syllabus. n if its not out of our syllabus thn we r supposed to b able to work it out since nu supposer fini maitriz all chapters n b able to answer questions concerning it. u tell me
    “Angelikdevil you not correcting the exams papers,right? wat the fuck u know bout standards and stuffS? just wat teachers told u,right? Teachers say ”CIE WILL FUX U ALL” and everyone is like CIE WILL FUX U ALL.”

    u say “just wat teachers told u right?” n to support this argument u use wat teachers told u!! “Teachers say ”CIE WILL FUX U ALL” i fink ur a really confused person. u’ve got to decide whether u wanna believe teachers or not. pfff… bring some more strong arguments not paradoxal n confused ones.

    i say “ptet uni pa pu pren nu” coz its a possibility just the way u r considering the possibilty of “CIE shooting us down”

    N yes baby, threshold marks r decided according to general performance coz they cant possibly put a threshold mark for really tough papers such dat only 2 or 3 students get an A!! come on! b realistic!

    As for x-factor, among the ones who reported not all had acces to those papers.. n even if they had access on the eve, exams were at 8 am…dnt fink they will hav tym to go to MES first, coz they cannt skip exams right? They had to go on the site b4 running n shouting “leakage leakage” everywhere. the comment was meant for the post who asked y those guys didnt do it after maths papers itself. dats bcoz its only after dat they came to knw.

    n candle, if i am spreading rumours abt “ptet uni pa pu pren nu” then wat r u doin? even u dnt knw wats coming! so how can u knw if cie will fix us or not?? is it nt rumours as well?? ur fear of a resit makes u say things like dat so dat everyone gets scared abt the papers for a resit. N sagar is right abt us being more mature as well nw dat we knw the stress dat is involved. we’ll get wat we deserve in a resit. those who hav to fail will fail n those who hav to pass will pass. we r all aware abt the fact dat papers mite b tough if there is a resit. but as i said, it cannot b out of the syllabus.

    n yea,WE R ALL STRESSED ABT HAVING TO RESIT!! EVEN THOSE WHO FINK ITS THE BEST SOLUTION!! so stop behaving as if those who r for the resit r very happy abt it!

  114. Dear angelik..before calling me stupid, wat i said bout teachers was just a simple example of wat i said. u r the one confusing things bout standards and stuffs and almost everything else…. not me. oh and.. im not fearing a resit. i just find it useless and more unfair. and no, it does seem that u saying ”ptete uni pa pou pren nu”. ur simplying implying that uni’s wont accept you.

    go and get things done instead of whinning =)

  115. Candle—>Most of us agree on a common platform.Why are you wasting your time in convincing some one who is clear out of his mind! !

    Almost all of us agree that many who want to re seat the exams are those who have badly worked and they found the perfect excuse to whine about.

  116. “u ppl here ur just idiots who really wanna lose 2 years of hardwork. im for resit n believe me im nt in a very good state! vivre avec l’hantise d’echec…mo kne sa tro bien. i was so stressed b4 my physics paper, i fell unconscious on the eve. Yet i was really satisfied wid my physics paper on the next day. im ready to go through the same stress j”

    Perhaps you are one in 10,000 to go through the stress again.oh wait.Perhaps you want to re seat for the exams because you want to be “perfect ” in your paper.

    And yeah, the so called idiots over here are showing more intelligence than you over here.
    and stop using sms lingo language.

  117. well, then if there is re-sit..
    i opt to do only the physics papers…

    —–
    another thing, suppose a student takes tuitions in all of his subjects, don’t you think he has an advantage over those who don’t take tuitions..???

    Then are we all on the same level or “pied destal” for the exams??

    Are those who repeat only for obtaining scholarships fair?? Aren’t they more experienced that those taking part in the exams for the first time?
    ===

  118. well if there is resit and that we get 2 results or certificates..then i think it will be wise to re-sit.
    Do you think so?

  119. “I TOTALLY AGREE WITH ANGELIKDEVIL… the BEST argument ever!!!”

    No.It’s the most stupid argument ever said and it’s written in sms lingo language.Double stupidity.

  120. things r being done candle. Poor you! U cant even read a post properly! i mentioned dat things r being done dear. nu pa pu rest le bras croiser. no matter wat u ppl r saying. but one thing is clear. i’ve placed so many arguments right in front of u bt no one actually had anyfing strong enuf against it. N tushal, ur just nt getting my point so it’s no worth discussing wid u. Its nt abt being perfect. Im pretty sure my performance in the resit will b worst coz the stress is definitely too much but i dnt want a certificate which will b questioned upon its validity. There no one here who actually came wid more down to earth arguments than me here. U ppl r only ranting abt stress stress stress. cambridge pa pou fou narnier blablabla.

    N tushal, u’ve got ur degree right? well i dnt hav one. N i need hsc result (valid one) 4 a university to get one. unless u bribed them, u must hav provided some kind of certificate to b accepted in a uni also.

    wat kind of intelligence r u talking abt? The confused ones like candle who tell me not to listen to teachers n yet bring arguments dat teachers told her abt???

    N candle, if u get confused wen ppl talk of paper standard n threshold marks thn its nt my fault. U asked hw i knw abt standards n stuffs! Just replying to ur question in the most logical way. Sorry if i havent been clear. maybe must find a simpler way for u to understand.

    N tushal, b4 u say anyfing abt my comments betta read n understand my point. N sorry if u dnt understand slang(hope u knw wats slang). N believe Tushal, its not one in 10,000. U really dnt hav any idea hw much we r. N among us there r many who knw they didnt work badly. they just want it 2 b fair.

    N the thing abt uni pa pou pren mwa, well even in this leaked exams i knw im not goin to fail. Bt whether results will b to my expectations or not, dat i cannot say bt i knw im nt goin to fail. so i’ll somehow get a place in a uni. Bt i dnt want a certificate like dis one which will always arouse suspicions despite the fact that i hav been honest. Dats unfair!

    A resit is nt unfair, o contraire! if u r a student who has worked hard throughout these 2 years, a resit shud nt scare u no matter how hard the paper is. The stress is definitely there. c le risque a courrir. it will b a stress for one more month for a certificate which will b useful for ur whole future. i strongly believe ke sa vo bien la peine.

    N tushal, yes im clear out of my mind to b willing to go through this stress again:) Mai ki pou fer!XD

    Candle, i gave an answer to every arguments dat u brought forward. did u do so? if u really fink im wrong, thn give me some valid arguments which may prove mine wrong.(dnt tell me stress again) im just waiting 4 them. who knws maybe i’ll b against resitting too! N yea, im being pretty straightforward. if i had to say dat uni pa pu pren mwa(btw,i already hav a place in a french uni thx to my AF certificate:P) thn i wud hav said it. So stop trying to distort wat im saying wen u dnt hav anyfing else to reply to.

    i noticed one thing wid u ppl here. u beautifully ignore arguments to which u dnt hav answers. N wen u dnt agree wid someone, all u say is “idiot who wants an excuse to do better” widout giving any reason 4 dat!! lol!! ur really funny guys!! N sorry 4 calling u stupid candle. Bt it really sounded stupid n funny wen u said “CIE will fix u all!!” as if we were goin to get university level papers!!

    N i fink, u ppl got this idea tightly fixed in ur head…dat those who want to resit only want another chance to perform better. It will surely b another chance to perform better (everyfing dat happens in life is an opportunity to do better) bt u cannot knw if its goin to b better or worse!! like in my case, i fink dat it mite b worse coz im damn tired! bt i dnt care. it will b fair n i knw it will b only wat i deserve. N the validity of the certificate will nt b questioned at least!

    whether u call it ego or watever, bt it will really hurt if after so much hardwork, someone comes n tell u, “ayo! ki kne!? Kav tosi tne ggne tiyo avan exams! saem tne kav travay! Kot pu kne??” Atleast for those who were honest it will b so…

    N yea! guys, i wud like to knw hw many here agree dat cambridge should b boycotted n unless they agree to change the way they prepare papers, MRU should go for another centre…like i said, things r being done already. Atleast we all agree here dat cambridge is the one to b blamed coz i personally do not hav anyfing against those who had access to papers b4 exams. We nid more ppl to support us in boycotting cambridge. Tushal n candle may probably say “idiots p essaye mesure zot a cambridge” bt atleast nu p fer kitsoz. Its the right time to strike..c zis kan ena scandal ki nu kav fer kitsoz. sa ban zafer la surely ti p ariV b4 2008. n even if there is a resit this year. Problem rest parey. Maybe next year pu reariv mem zistwar.

    Ena ban ti couyon ki p rod fer manif mai pfff…we r educated. sa pa pu servi narnier. “A pen is mightier than a sword” ;P

    We knw dat there will always b ppl like u calling us idiots for our ideas of fairness,honesty, fairplay,etc… n for every actions dat we r trying to take.. but we knw we didnt rant abt it widout doing anyfing. even if we fail to reach our goal.

  121. x-factor, if there is a resit. i wud hav really liked to knw my results for this exams as well… just to knw… But if there is resit, they will cancel this exams. so there will b no corrections for these papers so no results:(

  122. Tashul, whether i write in ur sms lingo lang or clear englisss lang, who cares?? my aimss is to givss my opinionss. Not to show ppl hw gud i can write englisss.

    korek sa korek sa..ariV sa…surtou kan pena otre choz a dir! roulé em sa!XD

  123. @Angelidevil >>Tashul, whether i write in ur sms lingo lang or clear eng<<

    his name is tushal… not tashul.. n i would advice u not to mess with him… 😛
    conseil d’ami! 😀

  124. LOL!!Ine raT sa! thx 4 d advice sandeep;P Sorry tushal:'(

    @ sandeep
    PS: y do u say so?? li ene tapere ou koi?? Damn! im scared nw! kifer persone pan dir mw sa avan???

    XD

  125. wow good work on being so eloquent Angelidevil. makes you look more retarded. ffs i wrote CIE WILL FUX(FUCKS) U ALL , NOT FIX . speaking of being stupid,confused etc. LOL Ur a joke.. u cant even differentiate between Fix and fux. good luck for the resit. ull need it.

  126. Wawa bizin boycott cambridge…..dpi lere zot parko accepT ki banla aussi en tord……..bezz sa,,,.sa bann anglais la pa pu accepT kumsa mem…….whether re-sit or not re-sit…..fauD pas laisse cambridge gagnant……….nou zelev ki bizin sott gagnant……pas dir pna leakage……..1 paK zelev P fini koner pu ban praticals-paper ki pu sorti….ey cambrigde ek MES gagne pou dire everything is under control……

  127. lol 😛 how u gonna do that? do not take CIE exams? lol..have u read the news?CIE says wat they want and its just believed to be true. ull end up fighting vs ur own friends in trying to fight CIE. they just too powerful. im pretty sure if all the studs were for a resit, and CIE gives u guys one, everyone would bow before CIE again. bah.. cie will come out heads up most prolly.

  128. ek sa mentaliT mauricien la……Dmin kuma tand dir pna re-sit..or no justice being done kot majorit pa daccord…….b lerla nuava geT……moi mo sire majoriT zelev is for a re-sit……N differ dan gouvernment…….gouvernment pou dan obligation fer kitsoz en faver zelev……La plipart ban proff aussi is for re-sit………Wa bisin daccord selman…..financially…….it is practically impossible to do the re-sit… Anyway…si ena strong evidence of “no” leakage from the internet source…….ben sa pa veut dir pna leakage pou ban practicals………..ladan zottu bizin daccord r moi……

  129. if 90% of the studs are for resit.. i doubt the other 10% will change ideas overnight. United,they stand :). (arsenal we fall :P)

    Check out Weekend Newspaper..CIE saying the questions discussed might be erronous..lol.. wondering wats next..ahhhh drama drama…

  130. sa to ena raison manchester United we stand…(arsenal .chelsea,liverpool) fall..lolzzz……….moi mo dir toi 1 zafer franc………I doubt pou ena re-sit…..But am for the re-sit if the leakage is confirmed……..Cki bezz ladan…..MES in signe 1 patenariat ek cambridge….samem la force cambridge…en + de sa tous zelev in paye fini cambridge….

  131. ena pli boku zeleve against resit..mo koir c bnla pu win…we will lose…moi si mo imP pa trop envi re passe par sa..mais mo prefer resit et ggne ene resulta ki valid…
    but i thk we’ll lose!!! koz nu pa p fer narien apart kozer lor blog!!!

  132. Do you guys even know that WHATEVER YOU PEOPLE DECIDE it will NOT AFFECT the decision of Cambridge?

    Oh wait, don’t tell me that you people did not thought about that.Ha.

    “its not one in 10,000″

    Oh god, did you learn how to use words to express your opinion?
    It was a ‘facon de dire’

    Sagar07–>”moi mo sire majoriT zelev is for a re-sit”
    Where did you had such facts?I got the opposite of what you’re saying.

    Most students are against the re seat because they don’t want to go through the stress again.
    And many among those who are fighting to have the re seat are those who have badly worked and they found a scapegoat in the so called leakage of papers and now they got the perfect excuse to claim the re seat.
    I can even paste the conversations that I had with those people but then it will be breaking the trust they placed on me to say what were in their small minds which is smaller than a peanut.

    “.But am for the re-sit if the leakage is confirmed…”
    Are you even aware that the leakage occurred only in the year 1981{Hope the year is right}.What was occurred lately is just a discussion leak.Don’t you people discuss the paper after you sat for it?

    If you want me to go on playing along with some stupid people, ok I can do it since I have nothing better to do.

    If you well, referring to those idiots who want to sue those guys who are aware of the discussion, then you need to see what were the intention of those people who on the first placed, open those discussion.

    If they had the intention of making the paper known to those who had not yet sat for exams, then only then they can be tried in a court of law.

    If they were only discussing the paper as all of us do after every exams’ papers, then there is no law which prevents that.

    @Angelikdevil–>Not writing in a bullshit sms lingo makes the reader feels comfortable to read the whole post and it also helps you to have better English.{I’m not trying to be your teacher.Friendly advice.}
    I stopped after the 4th line.
    And yeah, don’t thank me for insulting you.It was a pleasure.

    “u’ve got ur degree right? well i dnt hav one. N i need hsc result (valid one) 4 a university to get one. unless u bribed them,”

    No.I am still half way to attain both my degrees.

    The Universities of London and Mauritius will be happy to know about your views concerning my admission.

    The validity of the hsc result won’t be questioned.

    S4ndeep–>”his name is tushal… not tashul.. n i would advice u not to mess with him…”

    Infact, I like people to mess with me.I find a great pleasure in replying to them since most of them while arguing never comes well prepared..Perhaps I should be giving them some tips.

    Tips: Come prepared, don’t write in sms stupid lingo, double check your facts and double cross your opinion and views with the existing law, and try not to give an impression that you’re stupid and idiot, don’t whine too much, and finally I hate reading comments in creole since I take twice time to read it and understand it.

    I am not the enemy I’m here just for the sake of arguing trying to know the opinions of everyone.

    Angelikdevil—>”LOL!!Ine raT sa! thx 4 d advice sandeep;P Sorry tushal:’(
    @ sandeep
    PS: y do u say so?? li ene tapere ou koi?? Damn! im scared nw! kifer persone pan dir mw sa avan???”

    That replied made my day.
    No, I’m not a member of any gang or am I a gangster.
    I am who I’m.
    I’m Tushal.

    I don’t know if you people will agree, but I really wanted to know which colleges are you from.I will remain confidential.I won’t reveal that to any one.

    I am just preparing a kind of stats to see which colleges want re seat and which don’t want.

    Thanks.
    Have a nice Monday.

  133. @ Tushal..dan pa envi em re koz r toi,,,mais mo p obliger..pa toi ki p passe par sa la!! toi tone fini komposer..so better pa interfere!!! mo koner to cam so blog sa.. c pa cki toi to dir ki korek!!! si to ena mem otan guts, ale koz r MES, CIE tousa toi mem!!!

    “”””And many among those who are fighting to have the re seat are those who have badly worked and they found a scapegoat in the so called leakage of papers and now they got the perfect excuse to claim the re seat.”””””

    —–>im for the resit though ive not wrked badly..peu importe ki result mo ggner mo pa mind..koz mo place dan 1 bon uni ine deja fini garD pu moi!!!!!

    to pa trV pu narien to p mess with HSC students!!!! to pena oken rite to “insult ” others!!!!!
    get that clear, ok!!!

  134. Tushal for ur kind information all the 147 student fromm RCC r willing a re-sit……..saV dir banla in “badly worked”….wat a shame on them then……….????

  135. sagar07–>Before formulating such idiot and foolish comments re read my replies.

    I never said ALL STUDENTS WHO WANT TO RE SEAT HAVE BADLY WORKED.

    I said

    MANY STUDENTS WHO WANT RE SEAT ARE THOSE WHO HAVE BADLY WORKED.

    Thanks for posing yourself as an idiot.

  136. @Tishta–>Pardon me, but you’re obviously mistaking me for someone who gives a damn.

    “so better pa interfere!!!”
    Go and tell this to Cambridge, MES, the Government, parents, Newspapers, Editors, Bloggers, the list is long.

    Who ever would had this discussion going on their blogs, I would had surely given my views and opinions.I don’t understand why you’re feeling targeted when I said Many students who want to re seat are those who worked badly.

    I did not targeted anyone in particular.I talked based on facts and figures.
    I don’t talk out of the blue.

  137. I don’t know in which class you’re Sagar07 but I do hope that you know the difference between MANY AND ALL.

    Cheers,
    Tushal

  138. “to pa trV pu narien to p mess with HSC students!!!! to pena oken rite to “insult ” others!!!!!
    get that clear, ok!!!”

    I always appreciated that thinking of yours.
    Others have the right to insult me, but when I reply them, you turn on your defensive mode as if only you have friends.Especially when one of your friends came to insult me and when my friends took my side, you were every angry because my friends insulted that particular friend.But when he came to insult me,you did not see all those.
    Anyway, I don’t even know why I’m bothering to reply you.

    Not only you or him or whatever some one has friends.
    I do have friends and they have every single right to defend me and my opinions.

    Please, keep talking. I always yawn when I am interested.

  139. “I don’t think these guys r making an excuse……C quand meme
    RCC…..pas n’importe qui”

    WooooooW.Even if they go to RCC or whatever colleges, they are still students and they are neither god and nor should I be afraid of them.

  140. @ comment number 175-176

    Well well, it’s a bad reputation for mauritius and the future of the HSC candidates lie in the hands of MES and Cambridge. You decide:

    1) What if you did not work @ full potential and yyour friends who got the paper did?

    2) What if you did not work well and you’ve got a chance to sit for the paper in this year itself instead of repeating?

    3) The only solution for this problem is to kindly request cambridge to set different papers for different regions of the world: e.g Mauritius/Malaysia/Singapore sit for different types of papers .Whether leaked or not, this is not going to change anything.

    4) During the past 10 years, most people from chinese community have been entitled “Laureates”. What if they took your place?

    5) If you don’t want to take the paper again, sit back relax in your house and enjoy “a tarnished” image. And During the whole lifetime you’ll regret when you grow up!!! You guys are still immature and dont understand the consequences. If you really want to enjoy holidays/idleness then give up and dont give a damn care about this exam. And no university is going to recruit you as student……….

    Regards,
    yasir
    PS: My blog is offline for the time being, so come back after a week 🙂

  141. Do you think that would change anything about my views and opinions?I would not.Because primo, I don’t care what other people do.Secondo, I still don’t care about others.

  142. Yeah I know the differene between All and many…
    I said “all the students” from RCC……N not “all” the students from mauritius…etaa lire bien taa…..whatever…these students from RCC are among the best….. N if there r willing to re-sit…they must B feeling like “many” other students that the papers have no more credibility…….

  143. “N if there r willing to re-sit…they must B feeling like “many” other students that the papers have no more credibility…….”

    Since when does RCC students god?
    It does not mean that if they want to re seat the papers, others will follow their foot steps and follow them.

    Are you sure that ALL STUDENTS from RCC wants to re seat?What if I get 1 or 2 from that college who claims the opposite?

    “all the students” from RCC……N not “all” the students from mauritius…etaa lire bien taa”

    Ha.You’re telling me to read well?First blame yourself.Writing in stupid SMS lingo is shit.Learn how to write properly when I will read properly.And thank god, you do know the difference.I was worried about how to explain you the difference.

    Cheers,
    Tushal.

  144. “U don’t care for others….u r the most selfish person then….Parett to bien anti-social toi….Sundeep told me not mingle wiz u….li ena raison…huhh”

    Anti social?Perhaps over here, I’m the only one who has more friends than all of your friends combined together.

    And No.I am not a selfish person.I just don’t care about others.

    And I also don’t care about your views on me.
    Your views or any one else views don’t affect my life or anything else.
    And finally, a friendly advise.
    Don’t let your mind wander, it’s far too small to be let out on its own.

  145. @ Blog banned?? uhh.. no idea.. who?

    @EVERYONE! come’on! don’t fire at each other! This thread is getting pointless. Discuss your views, if you do not agree with what some1 else said, its a democracy, you may refute their statement providing your reasons.. but don’t go as far as personal attack. This message goes to everyone. Thanks for understanding.

  146. @s4ndeep–>we are betting on who will be the first to have his or her blog banned by the relevant authorities.Since we are already being tracked and our blogs are closely monitored.Especially those who wrote against the banning of facebook issue.

    We are not fighting.We are just sharing opinions and ideas.

  147. si ena pu fail..c zelev hsc so problem
    si ena pu resit..c zelev hsc so problem
    si ena pu cancel papers..c zelev hsc so problem
    si ena pu paC..c zelev hsc so problem

    mo pa kompren kifer ena dimune, sa pa concerne zot..mais zot ici pu koz nonsense..

    si ena pu resit ou non., c nu ki bisin fer sa..cki cambridge dcider, saem nu pu bisin fer…pa cki zot zot argue! pu narien p koz tousa!!!!

  148. @Tushal, I don’t think anybody in the Mauritian government might be as bold as going around banning blogs 😀 .

    @Tishta, S4ndeep himself is not a HSC student as I gathered but he did post on the HHSC issue.

  149. To the person who should not be named—>Consider me as the Devil’s advocate.I don’t mind you talking so much, as long as you don’t mind me not listening.

  150. Tushal, ur right! even i am aware of it dat many among the students who r for the resit worked badly( mo truv sa bien con) and, thank god! u precised not all! koz la majoriT ki p envi resit, c ban zelev ki pa ti pu fail any way. My reason 4 a resit is 4 fairplay n validity of my certificate. As for those who think its an opportunity to do better so let it be! Lucky they! i must admit im damn stressed abt the resit,i fear the stress might b more dis time. But im still for a resit. Tushal, it’s good to hav ppl like u here who r ready to giv their opinion even if they r insulted. Tone bien tire lor mwa but im still here waiting for a convincing argument on ur behalf. there is nofing here which actually made me reconsider my decision to support a resit. N for all here, today ti ena ene mari mobilisation for everyone who were for the resit. a great deal of colleges (including the star skuls) met at RCPL. For once, RCC n RCPL p fight together. We met rectors.After giving reasons for supporting a resit, the rector i talked was quite satisfied wid them. N dapré feedback frm students from other colleges,almost the majority of the rectors r on a common platform. Resit is the best solution. The majority of teachers r for a resit. They actually believe its da best solution though there is a great deal of stress involved. N we r quite a number of students. We definitely cannot organise such meetings by making announcements on facebook or blogs coz those who dnt wanna resit r definitely goin to come pou fer dezord..surtou kan ban organisers r constantly being threatened. Police force is aware of it nw n they r goin to b alert. i knw there r some of u here who r for the resit n maybe were nt aware of those meetings bt cannot make any announcement abt such meetings on the net like dis.

    Operation “cambridge boycott” is on.. we r definitely using the press for that. Those who r for resit pena lintention fer manif…we wanna do it in a more diplomatic way bt ban cki pa envi resit p rod excuse pu fer tamtam(manif=tamtam) coz they r definitely lazy students who just dnt wanna fight for their right of having a well deserved valid certificate. If they start goin on the streets, we r definitely goin to make it clear dat there r students who r for the resit as well.

    For those who dnt fink they’ve worked badly, they r fighting 4 it coz for them, c ene kestion 2 principe. As for those who tell everyone “even u wud hav done the same thing if u knew abt papers being discussed on the net b4 the exams! dats mauritian mentality!”
    well, they r wrong, it’s not abt mauritian mentality,its abt upbringing. Some ppl who neva hav done such a thing. Those who believe they wud hav done dat r just hiding this lack of moral values behind the word “Mauritian Mentality”. the guy who informed MES abt leakage is fighting 4 his values..Many rectors who dnt even knw him r supporting him in his fight. Now, we will try to talk to BEC. Find out where they stand concerning this issue. Si ban loret decid pu fer kitsoz, its gonna b 7 schools in for the fight. Surtou ki ban rector frm BEC skuls always talk abt values n they r actually encouraging their students who want to resit to keep fighting coz aparamen ena ene ta truk politik ladan ek BEC pa p rod dir narnier lor sa sujet la..nt until govt gives his verdict abt this issue( might b too late by thn) These rectors r telling their students (those for resit) dat they want a resit as well coz its all abt justice which is a recurring word in the policy of most BEC skuls. They r helpless due to the political aspect involved n perhaps many other factors like financing since we still dnt knw if the resit will b free bt they want their students to fight 4 it! Dats encouraging!!

    As for state colleges, no problemo wid politics. Rectors r able to express their views to the press. RCC rector even gave her opinion on TV. Students bien boulverC. Some believe its gona b too much stress n they wnt b able to handle it whereas some r already getting mentally prepared for it coz they believe a resit will b right. All reasons given 4 a resit were considered as valid so i dnt knw hw here, some ppl actually find these reasons stupid.

    one thing is clear, most of the students who r against resit r mainly students who dnt do science subjects. For many, it’s only maths. Perhaps they r deliberately omitting the possibility dat other subjects must hav also been leaked. So, if we consider only science students who hav got all their main subject papers on the net b4 the exams, there is a great deal among them who r for the resit. They r the ones who r mainly concerned coz there is solid evidence abt leakage concerning their papers.

    Its a fact that on science side, there is a rather fierce competition. 1 or 2 marks can make a big difference so even if its only a question which has been leaked(nt to forget that some questions can bring up to 10 marks) it will hav a significant impact on the marking. paper 5 has been leaked, n science students knw dat planning brings 15 marks for each of the 2 questions. Those who knew the planning question beforehand must hav dne really well…more time to think abt the question(if answers hav already been discussed thn i must say thinking abt more relevant ideas n precision to make there answer perfect coz marks r given for the criteria “Additional details” which i fink is 5 marks…bizin verify) n to plan the expt proposed. SO, even if cambridge says dat it doesnt make a huge difference we knw dat it will…especially wen we r aware dat Cambridge is saying so mainly bcoz it will help them avoid the expense of a resit. N as for nt considering it a leakage, thn cambridge will certainly say so coz they dnt wanna hav the reliability of their system questioned wen all these problems r actually happening bcoz of them!!

    i talked to some high ranked ppl who r member of the parliament 2day. wen i told them abt cambridge not considering it as a leakage, thn they agreed that they r just trying to avoid a question mark on their integrity. ene ban reaction c t :”kumen apel sa alor?” another was “anglais so fason penC sa!haha”

    wen we fink of it, this leakage is a kind of “modern leakage”. We cannot compare wat happened in 1981 wen barely any students had access to internet. Technology pa ti oci avanC ki sa. In the present situation, for a leakage, we cannot expect ppl bringing those papers a travers ban commercant by boat…(sa c kekchoz ki ti p ariV lontan sa…ban chinese ine bien beneficier 2 sa coz boku commercant sorti singapore ti p vini). N it’s a fact dat nw, even if u want to read a book, u somtimes read it on ur PC…so it’s nt hard copy right? let’s call this generation “soft copy generation”XD Its kind of true…just hav a look of hw many students r addicted to pc!(does it include us??? ban zombi pc)
    even i work past papers widout even printing them(the real reason behind dat is mo printer pa p marC…mai c n bon exemp kan mem:P)

    So, we can very well expect students to b getting access to papers in a more..euhh… sophisticated way(yea i knw it sounds funny). We r living up to our time. Dan goré si ena progré…kisana ti pou kwar? lol

    Discussion leak lamem kine amen question leak!! question leak la ine bring paper leak coz kestion la lor papier la!!! N paper leak lamem ki apel exam leak!! woaa c un vrai cercle vicieux! (bon.. omit this part…just having fun)

    As for La bouzie, wen cambridge say its erronous, thn its erronous. Si cambridge dire tone cheat, saV dir tone cheat. non mai!! vous etes aveugle ou koi??? vous ne voyez pas ke cela fait parti de l’effort sempiternelle de cambridge afin de ne pas etre scclerosé par un sceau d’inexactitude ou manque de fiabilité concernant les certificats de cambridge???? Fo pa se laissé dupé par des escro ki ne pensent ka leur profit!!

    PS: candle, really sorry for not having able to interpret ur sentence correctly…”CIE WILL FUX U ALL”
    But hw was i goin to knw if fux=fucks??? coz usually wen u use future tense, verb la pa accorD avec le sujet like in present tense. so it was supposed to b “will fuck” in dat case. Si to ti dir mwa avan mem ki twa to accorder thn i wud hav known dat if u meant “fix” then it wud hav been “CIE WILL FIXES U ALL”…pfff funny candle, kan ggn latet, to rod moyen pu fer kwar c pa sa ki tone dir. Just like last time wen i replied to ur questions abt standards..u ask me y im talking abt standards!!-,- i prefer nt discussing wid ppl like u.

    Bon, je vou laisse! bizin al dechir coltar pu mcq!! pena reviser la…zis bzn al develop pouvoir intuition! kav pik poule inTligemment! elimination of atleast 1 answer, then pik poule!XD

  151. @Angelikdevil–>
    I read what you had to say with great care and attention.I will reply you in some few minutes.I just have to complete my work.
    Many thought that I’m here only ‘pou faire vilain’.

    Glad to see that at least some people cater to weight my opinions and views.

  152. Angeli, slang as u say. normally i dont post things like ”fuck” directly on blogs and forums but it sure gives the meaning in a more ”civilised way”. oh well.. pren gagner.. n zelev hsc ki pa kone lire ek ki p done lesson ..pa kav pli bon ki n lot ki dia fux dan place fuck eh? i dont even know y im explaining that to u lol

    mm..the rcpl and rcc should be kept out of these stuffs. they just retarded punks running after scholarships. they just puppies of their teachers and rectors.we all know they both * schools but wat bout the other colls? anything from em? do they want resit also??

    go a fight for resits and get screwed on the exams. thats going to be fun to watch.

  153. @Candle—>LoL..I do know some other colleges which are against re seat.For example students from loreto college are against the re seat.Basing my facts on a facebook group.

  154. @Candle
    ********************
    the rcpl and rcc should be kept out of these stuffs. they just retarded punks running after scholarships. they just puppies of their teachers and rectors.
    ********************

    being an ex-rcpl, i cannot not reply u on this. Just puppies of their teachers and rectors?? lollllll… what a joke my dear. I guess you shall never understand y i am laughing… We guys might be sometimes arogant.. but puppies of teachers?? lol… teachers are like friends(those who arent end a poor and long death by the taunts of the students) and rector mayB… uhhh granny? lol.. but not puppies.. no no no.. u are hugely mistaken.
    end of discussion. Lets not argue about this. The “Subject” is something else. i just wanted to clear things (in YOUR mind).

    message aimed @Candle

  155. in that context, i was referring to those “intello’s . not including everyone eh..!*wish i could rectify the msg :)*

  156. And non science students have no say?

    Do you people even know why there was a re seat in the year 1981?
    Because Mauritian Students had received the whole paper.They had got the paper itself sent by whatever technology existed at that particular time.

    What happened in 2008 is some questions were discussed.

    2 different scenario.

    I’m eager to know what is written in the Cambridge report if of course, Cambridge has already prepared and sent it to the authorities here.

  157. non parko………cambridge is on defensive mode……..Ya some of the non-science department…strongly believe that their papers also were leaked……

  158. Yeah.And now everyone will say..hey my papers were leaked out..I want a re seat.

    Gosh..I don’t want the re seat because I don’t want to give those idiots and fucking retards another chance just because they have worked badly.
    Grow up kiddos.

  159. So, I would really like to know the idiot who said that all RCC students are for re seat.Well, even S4ndeep gave you a precious advice of not messing with me.And to that particular person, you talked FULL RUBBISH.Even at RCC there are two groups of students.one group is for re seat and one is against re seat.HA.you just proved that you’re an idiot and I think that we sould give you a sign that says you’re an idiot and put it around your neck. Till date, {I’m referring to right now}, there have been no decision taken for the re seat.The authorities concern are thinking of ending all relation with Cambridge and adopt the “Baccalauréat International”.What is that system?well, google is your friend.I can’t do everything for you people.DO some research also on your own.

    Concerning the tracking of IP to know which and who viewed that particular group or that particular forum, well, that is pure bullshit.

  160. who is the fool who said dat ALL rcc n rcpl r for a resit?? we certainly cannot expect unanimity in any school!! dats damn impossible. Not even loreto college by the way…even if there has been some idiots from loreto college who gave their opinion on the name of the whole college on the newspapers. QEC encor pli pir…they met only to end up in a fight…division total.

    As for adopting BI, this can b done only in, lets say 2 years… for the sake of form 4 n lower 6. les prof doivent recevoir une formation avan tou puisk’il fo dir ke cambridge fait kan mem parti de leurs moeurs juska present.

    petite note: a head examiner in my examination centre told me dat there is no proof abt the discussion as well n so, probably there has been nofing leaked…

    the story takes a new turn… reaction plz??

  161. apparently(according to rumours) the directorate of malaysia is nt even aware of this issue or discussion….

    point to b noted: Malaysians were also supposed to b involved in the issue so hw come no one knws abt it???

    we were 3 friends(who r for a resit) wen dat person tld us abt dat…n we r in a dilemma.. is this leakage a made-up story?? how abt those who witnessed it?? N the proofs dat apparently lucien finette checked out wen those guys came to MES to inform him abt the leakage? Hw abt the print outs dat some students from 2 or 3 colleges apparently sent to MES to prove these discussion n thus, this leakage??? wont resitting b unfair if all this issue has been made up?

    Im just being objective abt this issue.
    Sorry sandeep bt i had to reply in this blog itself coz all facts r here n not in the other one.

  162. Post 176………In reference to “Week End” of this….I said all the students….from “RCC”………Am sorry….its my fault…..But it was clearly mentioned that all of them want a re-sit……..but I didn’t said all from RCPL though……..Well I, from ADP….I can certainly tell…….75% of us find a re-sit………the best solution so far..en attendant…The famous report from cambridge…….

  163. angelikdevil, mo pou nek blok derier toi et support to ban arguments… parski dan sa “forum” la, letem to donne to ban opinion et ki ena dimoun ki pa pens pareil kuma toi, to gagn tou kaliter harsh comments (from tushal, post 107 To GiDEZEL Are you always this stupid or are you making a special effort today?) et c pa evident gagn 1 discussion constructif ici…
    mai vraimen, chapo… to ban opinion et arguments bien balanC…

    _________________________

    about your last comment:
    la question etai poser depui bien lontem, mai kmsi zot ti pre-ocuper coz lot zafer ici (ena ti bizin corrige fot anglai so camarad)…
    premier dabor, ti bizin mesure lampleur des fuites, comier zelev in gagn acces a ban info, ki kaliter info ti ena, etc…
    apre constat:
    – si realiser ki ena bocou zelev kin “tricher” then obligatoiremen TOU zelev bizin re-sit…
    – si realiser pena bocou zelev in tricher, bizin laiss passer et make sure next year pren ban precaution necessair…

    mai non, napa fin fer li.. .

    _________________________

    et pour conclure, 2 phrases…
    -apre reflection(i might elaborate but i want to keep it short), mo pas croir ena bocou zelev in gagn ban info la, donc pas pou bizin ena re-sit…
    -si mo fin mal evaluer et ki effectivmen, bocou zelev in gagn ban info, BIZIN ena re-sit…

    _________________________

    [NOTE: pou la 2m foi, tushal… plz, don’t respond to my comment…
    mo coner u don’t care about my opinion et ki c pa a moi de te dire sa, mai franchmen, u should learn about something called mutual respect… ou respect tou cour…]

  164. Are you trying to change me?Ha.Keep trying.Good luck.
    I am who I am.Get over with it.

    What if in the first place, there was no “leakage”?

    What if they saw the questions only after their papers?

    “to gagn tou kaliter harsh comments (from tushal, post 107 To GiDEZEL Are you always this stupid or are you making a special effort today?)”

    It was not a comment. It was a question.Questions end with a ?.

    “si realiser ki ena bocou zelev kin “tricher” then obligatoiremen TOU zelev bizin re-sit…”

    Sure.Some people are really stubborn to make them understand that those students did not cheat.There is no law which stops you from discussing an exam questions.

    You know what.There is another blog hosted by a well known person where you will get some really good answers concerning what you just said.

    Some one said it correctly, it is not easy to argue with kids. Because they think that they are never wrong.

  165. the word tricher was between inverted commas.. writing “those who had access to the questions b4 exams” is quite long. I knw it coz i’ve been writing this sentence a lot of times n it’s tiring. So i dnt fink Gidezel really meant it. they didnt cheat, i totally agree(n i fink everyone here agree abt it by now..dats y the word is between inverted commas now) but there’s actually no 1 word to describe it…unless we decide to use a word to describe it on this blog wenever we hav to talk abt them…just to make it easy. like “The Lucky Ones” or “ban tracer”. it will b better if tushal give the word coz u may start insulting us if we giv a wrong word according to u. L’internet est ouvert a tout le monde.

  166. wat does drinking n smoking come to do here?? Duh..i dnt even drink or smoke so i dnt feel concerned n even if i did, it’s like deviating from the major subject. Report coming 2moro so let’s wait n c. Any decision will cause havoc any way. if its against resit, those who r for resit will protest n vice versa. one thing is for sure, looks like govt p essaye esquive le probleme.. despite proofs, they r now saying dat they found none during their search?On the 15th proofs were very well there..even lucien finette admitted dat he saw them.Whether the exams shud b cancelled or not is one thing but denying so many evidences is another…politics? Possibility dat the govt is ready to play wid the future of mauritian youngsters for the sake of politics(n perhaps money) is pretty disgusting… In the coming years, zot pou soutir larzen ek nu mem.

  167. Angelikdevil–>It’s politics, like it or not, you will never know the full report.xD.
    It’s called PUBLICITY.Perhaps if you watch T.V you will see that publicities have nothing to do with the tv shows you’re watching.xD

    And yeah, you’re right.I don’t care what others think about me.
    The only way to get my full attention is ‘not to write in SMS lingo.’

    The Cambridge representatives are coming to Mauritius today{Saturday} and after having a discussion with them, the local authorities will take a decision.
    But I still think that Cambridge is “shifting” the blame on those few students and it’s sad to find out that many idiots are “walking” along Cambridge.

  168. The reason why I put it here, is to show that the upcoming generation of youngsters are crap and full of shit.

  169. “Duh..i dnt even drink or smoke so i dnt feel concerned ”

    You just lied..Although you don’t smoke and drink, I still think that you’re concerned especially when some one is smoking next to you.xD

  170. @candle. no news yet. When the final decision is out. i will close the comments on this article and arite another blog post to let everyone express themselves! 🙂

  171. right tushal, u caught my lie…those who smoke in the bus for instance…:SS we r actually inhaling wat they took out from their nose perhaps…urgh…but well, the one who smokes next to me is not necessarily a youngster..pffff…bon passons.. we r PROBABLY going to resit for physics n chemistry paper…so better start revising from now itself!! WOW! i neva had such a gr8 holiday in my life.. -,-

  172. nthg confirmed yet…some interesting stuffs happening between CIE and The Ministry of Education… been 3 days now 😛

Comments are closed.